Many Australians are glad the ACT Homosexual Marriage laws failed
Many Australians have welcomed the High Court’s decision to reject the ACT’s same-sex marriage laws.
The ruling upholds uniformity of marriage laws across the country. The ACT’s “marriage” laws were inconsistent with the federal laws and incapable of concurrent operation. This ruling shows it is not the jurisdiction of states to legislate in regards to marriage.
It’s important for marriage laws to continue to be administered federally – this is why the Marriage Act was passed in 1961 to have uniform marriage laws.
Marriage between a man and a woman is good for society and beneficial for governments to uphold in legislation. It’s about providing a future for the next generation where they can be raised by their biological parents, wherever possible.
Many Australians are also concerned for those same-sex couples who thought they were married under the ACT legislation. Were they fooled by the ACT labor and Green politicians? Understandably they will be disappointed at the decision handed down and it is unfortunate they were put in this position and also knowingly placed themselves into that position while others used it as a stunt marrying at midnight in front of parliament. This clearly shows the agenda of some homosexual advocates who are not really interested in marriage but are using it as a tool to get the respect they are seeking.
The debate about changing the definition of marriage has been given a fair go for the past three years with nine parliamentary attempts to change. Many people from the Greens and Labor do not understand the word NO. Immorality knows no bounds.
The ruling upholds uniformity of marriage laws across the country. The ACT’s “marriage” laws were inconsistent with the federal laws and incapable of concurrent operation. This ruling shows it is not the jurisdiction of states to legislate in regards to marriage.
It’s important for marriage laws to continue to be administered federally – this is why the Marriage Act was passed in 1961 to have uniform marriage laws.
Marriage between a man and a woman is good for society and beneficial for governments to uphold in legislation. It’s about providing a future for the next generation where they can be raised by their biological parents, wherever possible.
Many Australians are also concerned for those same-sex couples who thought they were married under the ACT legislation. Were they fooled by the ACT labor and Green politicians? Understandably they will be disappointed at the decision handed down and it is unfortunate they were put in this position and also knowingly placed themselves into that position while others used it as a stunt marrying at midnight in front of parliament. This clearly shows the agenda of some homosexual advocates who are not really interested in marriage but are using it as a tool to get the respect they are seeking.
The debate about changing the definition of marriage has been given a fair go for the past three years with nine parliamentary attempts to change. Many people from the Greens and Labor do not understand the word NO. Immorality knows no bounds.
