GAY TRUTH

The outrageous action of a federal judge who has imprisoned Kentucky clerk Kim Davis for not wishing to personally being involved in certifying a same-sex 'marriage' because doing so violates her Christian beliefs.  This was a lawless ruling by the judge! Federal law requires government to seek a reasonable accommodation for officials who have religious objections to things like this, but the judge ignored Kim's pleas to find an accommodation. Instead, he sent her to jail and ordered her employees to issue gay 'marriage' licenses that bear her name. We must stand up to this judicial tyranny!   Kim Davis did not pick this fight with gay activists; she has been working hard to attempt to resolve a conflict that was created when the US Supreme Court illegitimately ruled last June that every state in the nation must license same-sex 'marriages.' For example, she asked that her name be removed from the license, but the state refused, even though...

Q—What harm would it do to the institution of marriage if we redefine it to include same-sex couples? At the outset, it is worth noting that this question is often framed in a rather misleading way: “What harm would a same-sex couple getting married do to your opposite-sex marriage?” The issue, however, is not how any one couple’s marriage would affect any other specific couple’s marriage—the issue is how changing the definition of marriage under the law would change the social institution of marriage. Giving unique privileges and a unique status to the only type of relationship that can ever result in the natural creation of another human being sends an important message to society . Contrary to the charges of those who would redefine marriage, that message has nothing to do with “sexual orientation” as such. It simply sends the message that relationships of a type which can result in natural reproduction are unique, and are uniquely valuable to society; and it further sends the...

DETROIT, August 14, 2012, ( LifeSiteNews.com ) –  On Saturday, the Democratic Party’s platform committee unanimously adopted a plank that calls 32 states of the union discriminatory, because they do not support same-sex marriage. “We oppose discriminatory federal and state constitutional amendments and other attempts to deny equal protection of the laws to committed same-sex couples who seek the same respect and responsibilities as other married couples,” one plank states. Voters in  32 states , including California, Florida, and Ohio, have  voted  to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman.  Together, the states represent  358 electoral votes , far more than the 270 needed for election.  The platform language, which   leaked   to the media late last week, also formally supports the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), a bill pro-family organizations say would force religious employers to violate their consc...