Australian Politician forgets that it is not just churches which will lose freedoms if homosexual marriage is approved
Pro and anti-Proposition 8 protesters rally in front of the San Francisco City Hall as the California Supreme Court holds a session in the to determine the definition of marriage (Strauss v. Horton cases). (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Clive Palmer’s plan to “solve” the debate about changing the definition of marriage fails to acknowledge that it is not just church’s beliefs that need protection. Australian Christian Lobby Managing Director Lyle Shelton said individuals, business owners, ethnic communities, and Christian and Muslim schools also had beliefs that could fall foul of anti-discrimination law if marriage was redefined in law. " It’s great to see Clive offering ideas and it is good to see that he recognises that churches, mosques and other places of worship will lose the freedom to practice millennia-old beliefs about marriage unless protections are granted. “But Clive needs to realise that many groups and individuals besides churches will lose their freed...