Australian Census asks about the sin of gender and sexual orientation
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
-
Tuesday nights in Australia, the progressive Labour-influenced national census includes new offensive questions about gender and sexual orientation for everyone aged 16 and over. This woke-based offensive census illustrates the depth of brokenness and sin in our community, celebrated as good.
At the same time, seeking to diminish the influence of the Christian faith, they chose NOT to fix the mess they have made on the religion question. Their goal is obvious and arrogant - to remove the Christian influence by falsely pointing to a decrease in Christian belief. How? By placing NO REGION at the top, then splitting churches into the least attended groups and refusing to include Pentecostals whose attendance now exceeds the Catholics. It is a woke anti-Christian Labour agenda. It didn't even list: Jews?
For transgender and non-binary Canberra residents, the change is a powerful symbol of inclusivity. "It might seem small for some people, but it's a really important step to make sure we're capturing that rich diversity of what we have in Australia," they said.
The question is: why do we need to count and know about the mental illness of the extreme sexual immoral lifestyles, including the LGBTQ agenda?
"It's disappointing when you have to fill in forms in your everyday life that don't capture who you are." There is the delusion right there, the confusion of identity, media-driven life.
The new optional question about gender is in addition to a question about sex recorded at birth. Both of which are unnecessary inclusions by the woke Government.
"Trans people have always been here. We deserve to be counted as part of society," they said. And so goes the lie who suffer from mental health issues regarding confused identities are to be cured, not celebrated.
The 2026 changes are the result of a hard-fought campaign by LGBTQ+ advocates, including Equality Australia's legal director Heather Corkhill. Meanwhile, the churches were shown the door on the poorly written religion question, with the word 'No religion' at the top clearly drawing one attention. The LGBTQ lobby is a virus condemned by God.
"I think that it's quite a powerful moment, to be counted for the first time," Ms Corkhill said. For many it was offensive!
More than just symbolism, Ms Corkhill said the new questions would help fill crucial data gaps and lead to targeted services and support for LGBTQ+ communities."We see gaps in access to healthcare, health disparities, poverty levels, housing and homelessness disparities," she said. There are other issues you promote - normalizing homosexual sin.
"When I filled out the survey last time, I found that I had to randomly allocate my daughter a father even though she has two mums, which was a difficult moment for me," she said. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) also considered including a question about intersex status, but census spokesperson Emily Walter said it was ultimately excluded.
It is unbelievable the amount of pushing the LGBTQ mob demands, constantly.
Australian National University demographer Liz Allen said the census was "the most progressive one we've had yet in Australia".The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) also considered including a question about intersex status, but census spokesperson Emily Walter said it was ultimately excluded.
Yes,, it was progressive, woke-based, sin-based, abnormal and offensive to promote sin as normal.
"We found through testing that the question around variations of sex characteristics was not as well understood," Ms Walter said.
"We weren't confident that we could accurately capture that information."
Ms Corkhill said Equality Australia was strongly committed to working with intersex communities to ensure that they were captured in the next survey.
"Of everyone in the LGBTIQ+ community, I think intersex communities have the least visibility and the least understanding of their experiences, so it's really vital that we do include them," she said. Ancestry question also expanded
Australian National University demographer Liz Allen said the census was "the most progressive one we've had yet in Australia".
The government must ensure stability in the present and provide for its future. Everyone, including the homosexually oriented, depends on these things being done and done well. The two objectives are closely related, and children are at the focus of both. Providing for the future means bearing, educating and socializing children; children are our social security, economically, physically and emotionally. If there are not enough of them, there will eventually be a disproportion between those able to work and those who cannot, and the burden of supporting the dependent population can become so severe that it strains society's bonds. If the children are not raised properly, the well-being of those who depend on them later is threatened as much as, if not more than, if there are too few children. Marriage provides for society's future by formally constituting the family. The traditional family—husband, wife, and natural children—is the only way societies have ever found of provi...
To not tell Catholics who identify as LGBT that homosexual acts will lead them to hell is actually showing them hate. This was the bold message delivered Wednesday to the family conference running concurrently to the Vatican’s LGBT-affirming World Meeting of Families (WMOF) in Dublin, Ireland this week. Telling the truth to LGBT Catholics is urgent because we decide where we’re going for all of eternity by our choices and actions during our lives. “That’s the seriousness of what we’re dealing with here,” said Westen. “And that’s the seriousness we need to convey to all those in our lives who are afflicted with sexual confusion.” “It’s hate not to tell LGBT Catholics that gay sex leads to hell,” he told attendees at “A Conference of Catholic Families.” Westen noted for the audience how not more than 10-minutes’ walk from the Conference locale Jesuit Father James Martin would be delivering the message to Catholic families at the Vatican-presented WMOF that homosexuality and transgende...
Ginsburg did the same for several homosexual couples in the years before the court mandated that all fifty states recognize homosexual or fake “marriage,” leading many lawmakers, religious leaders, and pundits to demand that she recuse herself from the case for pre-signaling her personal view on the subject. She refused to bow out, however, and Obergefell v. Hodges declared a constitutional right to homosexual fake “marriage” 5-4 in 2015. A 4-4 tie would have allowed the lower court ruling in the case to stand ( in this case a Sixth Circuit ruling that states did not have to recognize same-sex “marriages”), but would not have set a binding precedent for the rest of the country. The 85-year-old Ginsburg, the subject of an upcoming Hollywood movie , said in July that she has “about at least five more years” before she retires. Rising baritone singer Samuel Schultz has accused a prominent homosexual couple whose “marria...
