Australia: Labor's Plibersek false homosexual marriage argument

Australia: Federal Opposition Deputy Leader Tanya Plibersek in a confusing argument, tries to equate homosexual marriage as being identical to other social changes around heterosexual marriage. 

In the past, there were social issues regarding heterosexual marriage:

• Aboriginal Australians marrying non-Aboriginals.
• Australian soldiers marrying Japanese after the war
• Catholics marrying Protestants

But the understanding of marriage was between a biological male and biological female.

Then she moves onto changes in women's roles:

• Working mothers and home mothers
• Single mothers in de facto relationships
• Kids removed from Aboriginal parents.

But again, the understanding of marriage was between a biological male and biological female.

She then seeks to imply that all these relationships can be grouped together under the definition of marriage or families. She said,

"Families come in all different shapes and sizes. What matters is the love and care in that family." Plibersek

Love and care for a pet - is real doesn't make  it a marriage.

All her examples point to social changes regarding heterosexual marriage, promoted by the media and Hollywood and people living together and if there is love and care - it must be a marriage. Her argument is simply false.

Homosexual male sex is against the biological design of the body as is lesbianism. There is no biological sex - it is fake and false. Heterosexual sex matches biological body design. Is is obvious that people may choose these disordered lifestyle but they are not marriage, and marriage will not make these relationships equal to those of heterosexual marriages.