Why has homosexuality 'acts against nature' now changed?
Fifty years after homosexuality was decriminalised in England and Wales. It was based on the simple yet false idea - sexual activity behind closed doors is private and the government has no interest in such private behaviour.
This logic of course doesn't work. Why? Because domestic violence, incest, underage sex, pedophilia - are all prohibited behaviours behind closed doors but are illegal?
So what is the difference? So only indecent behavior, acts against nature or buggery were decriminalized and given a free pass. Why? Homosexuals in power brought about changes using false arguments just like 'easy divorce.'
Why was it criminalized as indecent in the first place? Because everybody understood that homosexual behaviour was wrong, infertile, based on lust, against common sense, devalues marriage, against scripture and against children and families.
72 other countries and territories worldwide continue to criminalise immoral homosexual relationships, including 45 in which sexual relationships between women are outlawed.
There are eight countries in which homosexuality can result in a death penalty, and dozens more in which homosexual acts can result in a prison sentence. Though one would disagree with this harsh response it is sadly understandable as an immoral challenge to society, moral society and marriage and children itself. These countries are horrified when they see UK Anglican priest living in a homosexual lifestyle prohibited clearly by scripture.
Homosexual relations – which are variously criminalised under laws covering sodomy, buggery and “acts against nature” begs the question in that is homosexuality no longer against nature. This refers to biology.
72 other countries and territories worldwide continue to criminalise immoral homosexual relationships, including 45 in which sexual relationships between women are outlawed.
There are eight countries in which homosexuality can result in a death penalty, and dozens more in which homosexual acts can result in a prison sentence. Though one would disagree with this harsh response it is sadly understandable as an immoral challenge to society, moral society and marriage and children itself. These countries are horrified when they see UK Anglican priest living in a homosexual lifestyle prohibited clearly by scripture.
Homosexual relations – which are variously criminalised under laws covering sodomy, buggery and “acts against nature” begs the question in that is homosexuality no longer against nature. This refers to biology.
Anyone with a basic understanding knows that homosexuality is against biological design and has been and always will be against nature itself simply from a sexual design aspect. It is based purely on lust. Why did it change? Homosexuals demand their behaviour to be recognized as something good positive, wonderful and uplifting? Now they demand marriage. They demand not to be sackeed by Christian organization. They will take you to court if you say anything negative about their lifestyle choice.
Yet the Bible simply declares it is a sin - abhorrent to God, condemned by God where God hands them over to the full force of their sinful actions.
