SA Parliament wants to force homosexual immoral agenda on Australia
 |
| English: Tammy Franks. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
Parliament's upper house on Wednesday passed a motion congratulating New Zealand on its marriage equality laws. Introduced by Labor MP Gerry Kandelaars, it passed by just one vote, with the support of two members of the Liberal opposition. One vote is not a majority and says nothing about the support of immoral homosexual marriage. It does speak of a moral lack and discipline with the Liberal party seeking to be immorally trendy.
The vote came ahead of Thursday's introduction of a bill in parliament's lower house to introduce same-sex marriage laws in SA which has no authority to do so as it is a Federal Act not state based, hence the SA parliament is trying to force its immoral legislation down everybody's throat then embarrass those who don't support their worldview, and care less about how this will affect children.
Premier Jay Weatherill has already indicated he will vote in favour of homosexual immorality and sin.
SA Greens MP Tammy Franks said the passage of the same-sex motion in the upper house showed the issue had support across the political divide. Unfortunately Franks equates one vote as some sort of majority.
She urged Opposition Leader Steven Marshall to also allow Liberal MPs a conscience vote on the legislation to go before the lower house. Should she not allow all SA people to vote with their conscience instead of a few misguided consciences with homosexual agendas?
Ms Franks said it was untenable for the Liberals to allow a conscience vote on a motion in the upper house but not allow one when it came to reforming the laws. Should the Upper house be dictating to all Australia about immorality?
