Obama admin cannot force Christian funeral home to employ a transgender undertaker, judge rules
The Obama administration has been handed a
significant legal loss, as a federal judge ruled that it could not force a
Christian business owner to employ a transgender man who dresses as a woman.
The judge's decision also questioned the administration’s reason for filing the
lawsuit.
The Obama administration’s Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued a Detroit-area funeral home that would not
allow an undertaker to dress as a woman while interacting with grieving
customers.
In 2006, R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Home
in Garden City hired Anthony Stephens as an undertaker. As part of the process,
he agreed to abide by its dress code of white shirts and dark suits for men.
But in July 2013, Stephens wrote a letter to
his employer saying that he would begin dressing as a female at work and
would now be known by the name Aimee. He was subsequently fired.
The EEOC said that action violated the 1964
Civil Rights Act’s prohibition of sex discrimination, “because the employee
does not conform to the employer's expectations or stereotypes regarding how
someone 'born’ that sex should live or look.”
U.S. District Judge Sean Cox noted,
“Significantly, neither transgender status nor gender identity are protected
classes under Title VII” of the act.
Instead the EEOC had violated the owner’s
religious liberty, Judge Cox, a 2006 George W. Bush appointee,
wrote in a 56-page
ruling on
Thursday.
He wrote, while the government would likely
prevail on the Title VII case due to subsequent case law that went beyond the
law’s wording, it violated the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)
and ignored the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Hobby Lobby decision.
The funeral home’s majority owner, Thomas
Rost, said in an affidavit that allowing a man to dress as a woman in his
business would violate God’s commandments, because he “would be directly
involved in supporting the idea that sex is a changeable social construct
rather than an immutable, God-given gift.”
Rost, who was once a Baptist deacon and
sits on the board of the Detroit Salvation Army, said if he were forced to
comply, he would “feel significant pressure to sell” his business and give up
his “life’s calling.”
RFRA requires the government to use the least
restrictive means possible. “The EEOC has not even discussed the possibility of
any such accommodation or less restrictive means as applied to this case,”
Judge Cox wrote.
He also questioned the Obama administration’s
motives in bringing the case to court. The Obama administration “has not
challenged the funeral home’s sex-specific dress code,” which requires suits of
men and skirts for women, the judge wrote. “If the EEOC were truly interested
in eliminating gender stereotypes as to clothing in the workplace, it
presumably would have attempted to do so.”
Human Rights Campaign Legal Director
Sarah Warbelow called the decision “reckless” and “an incredibly dangerous precedent.”
The ACLU, in an amicus brief, said the notion of protecting
religious liberty in employment decisions is “staggering.”
But constitutionalists say the case is a
victory for freedom of conscience over an intrusive federal government.
“The government must respect the freedom of
those who are seeking to serve the grieving and vulnerable,” said Doug Wardlow,
an attorney with the Alliance
Defending Freedom, who argued the case in court
last Thursday.
“The feds shouldn’t strong-arm private
business owners into violating their religious beliefs, and the court has
affirmed that here,” he said. “They shouldn’t be forced into violating their
deepest convictions.”
The EEOC filed a similar case against Lakeland Eye Clinic in Florida on the
same day. The clinic chose to pay a
$150,000 settlement and
adopt new gender identity discrimination policies to end the case last April.
R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral
Home Detroit,
Livonia, and Garden City. In March, Wayne County residents voted the Livonia
location the “best
hometown funeral home.”