Australia: Senate hearing on immoral homosexual mariage

-

Senate hearings last week shone more light on the legal trouble dissenters of same-sex marriage will find themselves in if the law ever changes.

Martyn Iles gave evidence on behalf of ACL and the new Human Rights Law Alliance, established by ACL, which he directs.

More than 10,000 people watched his testimony online. If you haven’t seen it, I highly recommend you watch it and share with your friends.

Everyone simply needs to know that redefining marriage has big consequences for the freedoms of millions of ordinary Australians. The rainbow political groups advocating for change made it crystal clear they were opposed to anyone other than a handful of professional clergy being allowed to live out their beliefs about marriage in public without being fined or taken to court.

Wedding service providers should feel the full force of so-called anti-discrimination law if they declined to apply their creative talents to a same-sex wedding, leaders of the same-sex marriage movement repeatedly told Senators.

This is already Coalition and Labor policy. It is likely that Christian or Muslim schools teaching children the truth about marriage would also fall foul of so-called “hate speech” laws. It is ironic that another Parliamentary Committee, examining the controversial section 18C of the federal Racial Discrimination Act, is underway at the same time.

This Act makes it a crime to offend someone.

State-based anti-discrimination or “hate speech” laws also use subjective criteria such as offence as a trigger for legal action, as Hobart’s Catholic Archbishop Julian Porteous found. Homosexual marriage law is likely to see far more people dragged to court and fined than under the problematic 18C provision.

Labor Senator Louise Pratt thought she was on a winner when she set up the Select Committee to look at Attorney General George Brandis’ draft homosexual marriage bill.

What she has done has helped people to see that redefining marriage takes away the freedoms of millions of Australians at a time when homosexual couples already have equal rights.

Why the Senate is using its time to examine a draft homosexual marriage bill when it has blocked the Turnbull Government’s promised plebiscite is anyone’s guess.

But Senator Pratt’s move to establish the Senate inquiry has only further demonstrated why every Australian should get a vote on whether or not their freedoms are taken away under same-sex marriage law.

The Select Committee on the Exposure Draft of the Marriage Amendment (Same-Sex Marriage) Bill is due to report on February 13.

Popular posts from this blog

Ontario Catholic school board to vote on flying gay ‘pride flag’ at all board-run schools

-
Image
A Catholic school board in Ontario will vote next week on a motion to fly the rainbow-colored homosexual pride flag at all board-run schools during the month of June. Halton Catholic District School Board (HCDSB) Trustee Brenda Agnew gave notice of her motion titled “supporting our diverse school community” during an April 6 board meeting. Quoting Pope Francis along with LGBT talking points about “equity and inclusion,” the motion calls for the Board’s Director of Education Pat Daly to “direct all HCDSB schools including the Catholic Education Centre to fly the Pride flag during the month of June starting with 2021.” The motion is expected to be voted on by the Board at their next meeting on April 20. With nine trustees, the motion requires five votes to pass. A tied vote results in a fail. The HCDSB states on its website that its mission is to provide “excellence in Catholic education by developing Christ-centred individuals enabled to transform society.” The Catholic Church, basing i...
Read more

Christian baker must make ‘wedding’ bakes for gay couples, court rules

-
Image
DENVER, CO ,  – A Colorado board has ruled that a Christian business owner must make wedding cakes for homosexual "marriages" despite his religious objections. Business owner Jack Phillips came under legal fire in 2012, when he refused to bake a cake for Dave Mullins and Charlie Craig , who had traveled to Massachusetts for a marriage license, and wanted to celebrate in their home state. They sued on the basis of a state law that prevents the application of religious beliefs if one owns a business. The Commission's ruling, which was issued verbally on Friday, orders Phillips to report every three months for the next two years on anti-discrimination training for his staff, and any customers who are refused service at his establishment. "I can believe anything I want, but if I'm going to do business here, I'd ought to not discriminate against people," said one of the Civil Rights Commission 's seven members in a public statement. Phil...
Read more

Australia: Gay Hate tribunals are coming

-
Image
Are Hate Tribunals Are Coming In Canada , it is considered discriminatory to say that marriage is between a man and a woman or that every child should know and be raised by his or her biological married parents.  It is not just politically incorrect in Canada to say so; you can be saddled with tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees, fined, and forced to take sensitivity training. Anyone who is offended by something you have said or written can make a complaint to the Human Rights Commissions and Tribunals. In Canada, these organizations police speech, penalizing citizens for any expression deemed in opposition to particular sexual behaviors or protected groups identified under “sexual orientation.” It takes only one complaint against a person to be brought before the tribunal, costing the defendant tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees. The commissions have the power to enter private residences and remove all items pertinent to their investigations, checkin...
Read more