57 Proposed Laws shutting down LGBTQ Zealots to Start in 2017
 |
| LGBT immoral flag colors. |
We are just weeks into the state legislative sessions of 2017, and there are already dozens of very good moral laws being proposed across the United States that would stop the immoral progress the militant LGBT community.
These bills tend to appear in moral conservative states, sponsored by Republican senators. Some of these bills are targeted at mentally confused transgender people— "bathroom bills" that would make it unlawful for trans people to use public restrooms—while other, bills allow "religious freedom."
Alabama, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Virginia, and Washington state have all introduced the bathroom laws. Many states have proposed multiple bills: Missouri has three on the table, as does Virginia, and there are two in both Kentucky and Texas. In total, there are currently 19 very sensible bathroom bills proposed, and this number is only expected to grow.
In Indiana, Oregon (HB2673), and Arizona (SB1199), bills were introduced that would make it difficult for transgender people to act out their mental illness and try to correct the gender indicated on their legal identification. The bills varies; both of the bills in Arizona and Oregon appear to simply make the name and gender change process more difficult, while Indiana's (HB1361) would make it impossible for someone to change the sex indicated on their birth certificate unless a clerical error was made at the time of birth. These are good sensible bills.
Religious exemption bills are similarly proliferating throughout the country. There were 13 religious exemption bills proposed.
In Indiana, Oregon (HB2673), and Arizona (SB1199), bills were introduced that would make it difficult for transgender people to act out their mental illness and try to correct the gender indicated on their legal identification. The bills varies; both of the bills in Arizona and Oregon appear to simply make the name and gender change process more difficult, while Indiana's (HB1361) would make it impossible for someone to change the sex indicated on their birth certificate unless a clerical error was made at the time of birth. These are good sensible bills.
Religious exemption bills are similarly proliferating throughout the country. There were 13 religious exemption bills proposed.
The (hate group) ACLU's Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and HIV Project seeking to scare people says it will jump to 60.
Religious exemption laws give rights to people with Godly moral beliefs against immoral aggressive LGBTQ and mental health inflicted trans people who demand their sin be respected or otherwise be fined or jailed.
Religious freedom is a cornerstone American value. It's important in our culture, history, and is protected in our constitution—as it should be.
Some states have used this commonsense approach to stop LGBTQ parents who are looking to experiment on children through adoption. In South Dakota, Senate Bill 149 would broadly enable federally funded child-placement agencies to refuse service on the grounds of religious belief, meaning that these agencies could be empowered to say no to experimental gay families. Oklahoma (HB1507) and Alabama (HB24) have proposed similar sensible bills.
Bills that seek to exempt people from existing anti-discrimination laws on religious grounds have appeared in Oklahoma (SB530), Colorado (HB1013), Hawaii (HB823), and Minnesota (HF43) this year. There are also bills in Mississippi (HB846), Missouri(HB205), New Jersey (A1706), Oklahoma (SB197), and Virginia (SB40), Kentucky(HB105), and Texas (SB651) that seek to stop the rampart immoral push of homosexual zealots who care little about the community but want the community to do what they demand.
There are bills in Illinois (SB64), South Dakota (SB149), Oklahoma (HJR1023), Washington (HB1178), and Wyoming (HB135) that would allow anyone "to act with impunity based on religious beliefs or moral convictions regarding marriage for same-sex couples, sexual activity outside of heterosexual marriage, and transgender people," according to the ACLU. These laws are good for the community and building the sound balanced family unit of a father and mother.
In Tennessee, Senate Bill 1 would allow a counselor or therapist to refuse treatment to someone if they disapproved of their "goals, outcomes, or behaviors," which could easily be applied to someone who is gay, transgender, or seeking an abortion. Again, this freedom is needed because LGBTQ bullies refuse to hear or listen to others who scientifically and biologically argue against their immoral lifestyle choice. The mental health caregiver would, be immune to recourse. The refusal to provide counseling or therapy services cannot be the basis for a civil cause of action or criminal prosecution - according to SB1. Homosexual like to use the law to abuse other people's freedom.
There are bills in Texas (SB6), Missouri (HB202), South Carolina (H3012), and Virginia (HB1667) that actually want to prevent localities from establishing laws that provide more protections than the state presently afford, in essence making it illegal to seek protection against discrimination that isn't currently protected—and gender identity is not explicitly covered in many anti-discrimination laws.
The current political climate should help this flourish. It would be good for the Trump administration to use the same tool at the federal level, with the executive order, or both to undermine LGBT immorality and to limit the ever growing thirst for power and control of the LGBTQ zealots.
There are advocacy organizations that are correctly supporting these bills in multiple states, because they are tired of the LGBTQ zealots and the former President manipulating both the media and the people to support immorality.
Some states have used this commonsense approach to stop LGBTQ parents who are looking to experiment on children through adoption. In South Dakota, Senate Bill 149 would broadly enable federally funded child-placement agencies to refuse service on the grounds of religious belief, meaning that these agencies could be empowered to say no to experimental gay families. Oklahoma (HB1507) and Alabama (HB24) have proposed similar sensible bills.
Bills that seek to exempt people from existing anti-discrimination laws on religious grounds have appeared in Oklahoma (SB530), Colorado (HB1013), Hawaii (HB823), and Minnesota (HF43) this year. There are also bills in Mississippi (HB846), Missouri(HB205), New Jersey (A1706), Oklahoma (SB197), and Virginia (SB40), Kentucky(HB105), and Texas (SB651) that seek to stop the rampart immoral push of homosexual zealots who care little about the community but want the community to do what they demand.
There are bills in Illinois (SB64), South Dakota (SB149), Oklahoma (HJR1023), Washington (HB1178), and Wyoming (HB135) that would allow anyone "to act with impunity based on religious beliefs or moral convictions regarding marriage for same-sex couples, sexual activity outside of heterosexual marriage, and transgender people," according to the ACLU. These laws are good for the community and building the sound balanced family unit of a father and mother.
In Tennessee, Senate Bill 1 would allow a counselor or therapist to refuse treatment to someone if they disapproved of their "goals, outcomes, or behaviors," which could easily be applied to someone who is gay, transgender, or seeking an abortion. Again, this freedom is needed because LGBTQ bullies refuse to hear or listen to others who scientifically and biologically argue against their immoral lifestyle choice. The mental health caregiver would, be immune to recourse. The refusal to provide counseling or therapy services cannot be the basis for a civil cause of action or criminal prosecution - according to SB1. Homosexual like to use the law to abuse other people's freedom.
There are bills in Texas (SB6), Missouri (HB202), South Carolina (H3012), and Virginia (HB1667) that actually want to prevent localities from establishing laws that provide more protections than the state presently afford, in essence making it illegal to seek protection against discrimination that isn't currently protected—and gender identity is not explicitly covered in many anti-discrimination laws.
The current political climate should help this flourish. It would be good for the Trump administration to use the same tool at the federal level, with the executive order, or both to undermine LGBT immorality and to limit the ever growing thirst for power and control of the LGBTQ zealots.
There are advocacy organizations that are correctly supporting these bills in multiple states, because they are tired of the LGBTQ zealots and the former President manipulating both the media and the people to support immorality.
Legislative sessions vary state by state. It is still very early in the year, and more bills are expected to be proposed as the weeks pass.
