Another LGBT Case Was Just Appealed to Supreme Court
 |
| U.S. Supreme Court building. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
The U.S. Supreme Court, which is already set to hear a case on transgender student (mental health) next month, may be hearing another immoral homosexual rights case in the near future.
The National Center for Lesbian Rights and private attorneys have asked the high court to hear a case from Arkansas in which the state refused to automatically list both same-sex parents on birth certificates for children conceived through donor insemination, NCLR announced today. In 2015, a judge in Pulaski County found in favor of the couples who sued to have their names listed, but late last year the Arkansas Supreme Court overturned that ruling, so today the couples’ lawyers petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court.
The homosexual bullies are at it again but this time the children who grow up will suffer.
Whether the high court takes the case remains to be seen, but the lawyers say the Arkansas ruling violated the law as set down in Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 decision in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that immoral homosexual couples must be treated the same as other couples in all aspects of marriage, including birth and death certificates.
Whether the high court takes the case remains to be seen, but the lawyers say the Arkansas ruling violated the law as set down in Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 decision in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that immoral homosexual couples must be treated the same as other couples in all aspects of marriage, including birth and death certificates.
Unfortunately, that case was false and was built on the premise that homosexuality was unchangeable. Now we discover it can be a spectrum adn can change - hence it is now a lifestyle choice. A choice is made to be homosexual. The born gay theory has been thrown out. The judgement was a 1 vote victory and it should now be thrown out as LGBT lawyers lied about the immoral sin of homosexuality itself.
Under Arkansas law, if a woman with a male spouse gives birth to a child conceived through donor insemination, her husband is automatically listed as a parent on the birth certificate. But birth mothers with female spouses were told they must obtain a court order to have both parents listed. This is fair and just.
In the Arkansas Supreme Court ruling, Justice Josephine Linker Hart, writing for the court’s majority, cited what she called “basic biological truths.” “In the situation involving the female spouse of a biological mother, the female spouse does not have the same biological nexus to the child that the biological mother or the biological father has,” Hart wrote. “It does not violate equal protection to acknowledge basic biological truths.”
Under Arkansas law, if a woman with a male spouse gives birth to a child conceived through donor insemination, her husband is automatically listed as a parent on the birth certificate. But birth mothers with female spouses were told they must obtain a court order to have both parents listed. This is fair and just.
In the Arkansas Supreme Court ruling, Justice Josephine Linker Hart, writing for the court’s majority, cited what she called “basic biological truths.” “In the situation involving the female spouse of a biological mother, the female spouse does not have the same biological nexus to the child that the biological mother or the biological father has,” Hart wrote. “It does not violate equal protection to acknowledge basic biological truths.”
