‘Jesus Never Mentioned Homosexuality!’ Why Not?

-


“Jesus never mentioned homosexuality!” That often-heard statement is one of the quickest and most common excuses people give for approving homosexual practice.

Does it hold any weight biblically, though? And if it is true that Jesus never mentioned it, does that really justify such behavior?

The answer is “no” to both questions. Here’s why.

He Didn’t Need to Say It For It To Be True
Jesus didn’t mention any number of sins. For example, He never mentioned child sexual abuse or wife beating. Does that mean He was okay with them?
Jesus didn’t need to comment on such behavior. In the first century Judaism, there was no debate about its sinfulness. He would have been preaching to the choir.

The “Jesus never mentioned it” argument assumes that only the words of Jesus are divinely inspired. It’s a “biblical” argument that ignores the rest of the Bible. It also ignores Jesus’ own witness to the divine origin of Scripture (Mark 12:35-36).

Most of what Jesus said wasn’t even recorded in the Bible (John 20:30; 21:25; Revelation 22:18-19).

Homosexual practices were strongly condemned in the Old Testament (Leviticus 18:22; 20:13). Jesus affirmed those prohibitions (Matthew 5:17-20).
Many activists claim that Jesus didn’t use the word “homosexual” because He just didn’t realize it was holy, healthy, God-ordained and God-approved. But if so, why even bring Jesus into the conversation? This claim amounts to saying Jesus didn’t know what He was talking about when he spoke on moral matters. If that’s the case, then let’s all just quit listening to Him. Yet those who make this claim treat it as if Jesus were the only authority we should listen to. They’re not just contradicting Scripture, they’re contradicting themselves!
The argument wrongly implies that the New Testament’s purpose was to re-state or to create a new list of forbidden practices and that anything not on the list was approved by God.

The Teaching Is Still Scriptural
Jesus re-affirmed all of the moral law (Matthew 5:17-20). He chided those who broke the commandments and taught others to do the same (Romans 1:32). Here it’s important to distinguish several kinds of Old Testament law. The Old Testament contained ritual (ceremonial), sacrificial, civil and moral law. Jesus affirmed all of it, though He brought the ritual and sacrificial laws to a close by fulfilling them.

The civil law was established to guide affairs of state for Israel and to mark out Israel as a separate and distinct nation. The moral law, however, reflects the very character of God. God will not change so the moral law cannot change, either. It will continue throughout eternity.

Homosexual behavior is thoroughly condemned every time it is mentioned, both in the Old Testament and the New (see Leviticus 18:22; 20:13; Romans 1:18-32; 1 Corinthians 6:9-11; 1 Timothy 1:8-11; Jude 1:7).

Nowhere in Scripture or history — until the last century — has homosexuality been thought of as an inborn, natural and unchanging orientation. The Bible only speaks of behavior, not orientation.

Finally, homosexual behavior does not fit the stated purpose of sexuality in the Bible. Human sexuality was always meant to be expressed solely in a one-man, one-woman marital covenant. (See Genesis 1:27; 2:23-24; 5:2; Matthew 19:4-6; Ephesians 5:31). In fact, it was designed by God to prefigure the eternal covenant of marriage that is to take place between Jesus Christ (The Bridegroom) and His Church (The Bride).

So, does the possibility that Jesus never mentioned “homosexuality” in the Bible create an excuse for homosexual practice? In the very strong words of the Apostle Paul, “May it never be!” (Romans 3:4).


Dr. David Kyle Foster (M-Div, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School; D-Min, Trinity School for Ministry) is the author of Transformed Into His Image and Love Hunger and is the founder/director of Pure Passion Media (www.PurePassion.us). Read more of his take on sexual sin and brokenness in his newest book, The Sexual Healing Reference Edition.

Popular posts from this blog

Ontario Catholic school board to vote on flying gay ‘pride flag’ at all board-run schools

-
Image
A Catholic school board in Ontario will vote next week on a motion to fly the rainbow-colored homosexual pride flag at all board-run schools during the month of June. Halton Catholic District School Board (HCDSB) Trustee Brenda Agnew gave notice of her motion titled “supporting our diverse school community” during an April 6 board meeting. Quoting Pope Francis along with LGBT talking points about “equity and inclusion,” the motion calls for the Board’s Director of Education Pat Daly to “direct all HCDSB schools including the Catholic Education Centre to fly the Pride flag during the month of June starting with 2021.” The motion is expected to be voted on by the Board at their next meeting on April 20. With nine trustees, the motion requires five votes to pass. A tied vote results in a fail. The HCDSB states on its website that its mission is to provide “excellence in Catholic education by developing Christ-centred individuals enabled to transform society.” The Catholic Church, basing i...
Read more

Christian baker must make ‘wedding’ bakes for gay couples, court rules

-
Image
DENVER, CO ,  – A Colorado board has ruled that a Christian business owner must make wedding cakes for homosexual "marriages" despite his religious objections. Business owner Jack Phillips came under legal fire in 2012, when he refused to bake a cake for Dave Mullins and Charlie Craig , who had traveled to Massachusetts for a marriage license, and wanted to celebrate in their home state. They sued on the basis of a state law that prevents the application of religious beliefs if one owns a business. The Commission's ruling, which was issued verbally on Friday, orders Phillips to report every three months for the next two years on anti-discrimination training for his staff, and any customers who are refused service at his establishment. "I can believe anything I want, but if I'm going to do business here, I'd ought to not discriminate against people," said one of the Civil Rights Commission 's seven members in a public statement. Phil...
Read more

Australia: Gay Hate tribunals are coming

-
Image
Are Hate Tribunals Are Coming In Canada , it is considered discriminatory to say that marriage is between a man and a woman or that every child should know and be raised by his or her biological married parents.  It is not just politically incorrect in Canada to say so; you can be saddled with tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees, fined, and forced to take sensitivity training. Anyone who is offended by something you have said or written can make a complaint to the Human Rights Commissions and Tribunals. In Canada, these organizations police speech, penalizing citizens for any expression deemed in opposition to particular sexual behaviors or protected groups identified under “sexual orientation.” It takes only one complaint against a person to be brought before the tribunal, costing the defendant tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees. The commissions have the power to enter private residences and remove all items pertinent to their investigations, checkin...
Read more