Transgender lawyer drags Jack Phillips to court - refused bake transgender cake
Transgender lawyer Autumn Scardina, center, intentionally and maliciously set up Jack Phillips by requesting a transgender cake to be made to celebrate his gender transition to a fake female. Scardina knew Jack Phillips would refuse to bake a transgender celebration cake and intentionally sought to corner him in order to drag him to court to harass and embarrass his belief before the world.
LGBT TWISTED IDEOLOGY - TO COERCE AND MANIPULATE TO ACHIEVE THEIR DESIRES - EPIC FAILURE AS THEY SHOW THEIR TRUE COLORS
Mr. Phillips's shop refused to make the cake after Mr. Scardina revealed he/she wanted it to celebrate her transition from male to female.
"[He] believes as a matter of religious conviction that sex — the status of being male or female — is given by God, is biologically determined, is not determined by perceptions or feelings, and cannot be chosen or changed," his lawyers said.
But the Colorado Civil Rights Commission said Mr. Phillips had discriminated against Ms Scardina because she is transgender. CCRC need to be stripped of their autority due to their blind bias.
Mr /Mrs. Scardina asked for the cake on the same day the US Supreme Court announced it would consider Mr. Phillips's appeal of the previous commission ruling against him after he refused to bake a cake for same-sex couple Charlie Craig and Dave Mullins in 2012.
Mr. Phillips's lawsuit claims he has been harassed and has received death threats and that his small shop was vandalised while the wedding cake case made its way through the courts.
Religious beliefs vs Fake Gay right
The Supreme Court ruled in June that the Colorado commission showed anti-religious bias when it sanctioned Mr. Phillips for refusing to make the gay wedding cake, voting 7-2 that it violated Mr. Phillips's First Amendment rights.
Mr. Phillips's lawsuit alleges that Colorado violated his First Amendment right to practice his faith and 14th Amendment right to equal protection.
It seeks $100,000 in punitive damages from Aubrey Elenis, director of the Colorado Civil Rights Division. Many think it should be more like $100m to stop CCRC being a bully for LGBT ideology.
In the case of the transgender cake, state officials argued for the case to be dismissed, but the judge said he was inclined to let the case move forward and would issue a written ruling later.
The US baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple on religious grounds is facing a fresh lawsuit — this time for refusing to bake a cake celebrating a gender transition. Lawyers for Jack Phillips, of Colorado, argued the state was treating Mr. Phillips with hostility because of his Christian faith and pressing a complaint that they labeled an "obvious set-up". Transgender lawyer Autumn Scardina called Mr. Phillips's bakery, Masterpiece Cakeshop, in 2017, requesting a cake that was blue on the outside and pink on the inside, knowing full well that he would refuse, with the intention to humiliate him and drag him to court. This is the LGBT way!
Mr. Phillips's shop refused to make the cake after Mr. Scardina revealed he/she wanted it to celebrate her transition from male to female.
"[He] believes as a matter of religious conviction that sex — the status of being male or female — is given by God, is biologically determined, is not determined by perceptions or feelings, and cannot be chosen or changed," his lawyers said.
But the Colorado Civil Rights Commission said Mr. Phillips had discriminated against Ms Scardina because she is transgender. CCRC need to be stripped of their autority due to their blind bias.
Mr /Mrs. Scardina asked for the cake on the same day the US Supreme Court announced it would consider Mr. Phillips's appeal of the previous commission ruling against him after he refused to bake a cake for same-sex couple Charlie Craig and Dave Mullins in 2012.
Mr. Phillips's lawsuit claims he has been harassed and has received death threats and that his small shop was vandalised while the wedding cake case made its way through the courts.
"At this point, he's just a guy who is trying to get back to life," said Jim Campbell, an attorney for the Christian non-profit law firm Alliance Defending Freedom. "The problem is the state of Colorado won't let him."
Religious beliefs vs Fake Gay right
The Supreme Court ruled in June that the Colorado commission showed anti-religious bias when it sanctioned Mr. Phillips for refusing to make the gay wedding cake, voting 7-2 that it violated Mr. Phillips's First Amendment rights.
Mr. Phillips's lawsuit alleges that Colorado violated his First Amendment right to practice his faith and 14th Amendment right to equal protection.
It seeks $100,000 in punitive damages from Aubrey Elenis, director of the Colorado Civil Rights Division. Many think it should be more like $100m to stop CCRC being a bully for LGBT ideology.
In the case of the transgender cake, state officials argued for the case to be dismissed, but the judge said he was inclined to let the case move forward and would issue a written ruling later.
