Philip Ruddock Religious Freedom inquiry on immoral sinful LGBT rights
Do you want to loose your religious Freedoms? The LGBTQI folk are not asking but are demanding all religious restrictions be removed so they can do whatever they want. They will talk in terms of hate, discrimination, intolerance, unfairness. But once religious freedoms are gone they will not come back. the UK and USA are prime examples where promises were made then watered down fast.
This is a submission to the Ruddock enquiry. Make up your own and submit it here
- Freedom of religion is more
than freedom to worship, it is freedom to live out one’s Biblical faith in
public. This freedom must be protected in all government contracts,
universities, and various workplaces.
- Employment associations must
not have the right to refuse any application by Christians who hold the
view of Biblical marriage.
- Christian Parents must have the
right to be notified of and then withdraw their children from public
school classes teaching any form of LGBTIQ sex and gender theory.
- Religious charities must be
allowed to hold their view of man-woman marriage without fear of losing
government funding or charitable status.
- Religious charities that are
government funded, should be able to dismiss an employed worker who
returns to work ‘married in a same sex marriage’ contrary to their
religious signed contract which requires adherence to and support of biblical
doctrine that rejects all sexual relationship outside of marriage.
- Preachers should be allowed to
place their sermons regarding man-woman marriage on-line without fear of
being taken to an anti-discrimination tribunal or commission.
- Christian schools must be
allowed to teach children the biblical view of marriage without fear of
being reported to a government commission Victoria).
- Christian schools should be
allowed to positively discriminate in employment for people who adhere to
their biblical beliefs on marriage.
- State and federal
anti-discrimination law should be amended to ensure that no-one can be
prosecuted for expressing the view that marriage is between one man and
one woman.
- Properties owned and run by
Christian organization like campsites, must have the right of refusal of
any bookings by groups that contradict biblical teaching on sexuality.
- New religious celebrants (in
the future) should be allowed to practice freely in accordance with their
conscience. The legislation does not allow for new religious celebrants in
the future?
- Independent Christian churches (non-denominational)
must have the right of refusal to perform any marriage outside of the
biblical definition of marriage.
- There should be no legal
detriment to anyone who expresses the view that marriage is between one
man and one woman.
- I ask that this submission be considered
by the Panel and I give consent for this submission to be published by the
Panel among its default, public list of submissions received.
