USAID is openly financing the campaigns of homosexual candidates in pro-family countries
Official photographic portrait of US President Barack Obama (born 4 August 1961; assumed office 20 January 2009) (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
Alexandria
L. Panehal, Mission
Director for USAID in the Dominican Republic, told reporters at
a press conference yesterday in the capital of the Caribbean nation that the
United States Agency for International Development will be spending $1 million
to finance the promotion of the LGBT agenda, including contributions to LGBT
politicians who wish to participate in the upcoming elections. "We have
established two funds through USAID in order to finance these activities
throughout the world, and thanks be to God the Dominican Republic won the grant
that has made it possible for us to strengthen the efforts on behalf of the
LGBT community," stated Ms. Panehal.
The website
of USAID proudly includes a section entitled USAID LGBT
Vision for Action under
it's "What We Do" page.
In a memorandum which lays out the
agency's mandate to impose sexual immorality upon the world, the agency cites
the "groundbreaking Presidential
Memorandum,
[in which] President Barack Obama directed USAID and all federal agencies
engaged abroad to ensure that the United States promotes and protects the
rights of LGBT people."
The Dominican
Republic has been a special target of the Obama administration's foreign policy
LGBT agenda as evidenced by the appointment of the first "married"
homosexual ambassador, Wally Brewster, sent to influence the Caribbean nation
that currently outlaws homosexual unions along with polygamous unions and other
disordered sexual behavior as harmful to society.
The
ambassador has made it a point to appear in public with his homosexual
"spouse" and even regularly tours schools with the "spouse"
in order to desensitize the young children to his sexual immorality.
Local
activists are at a loss as to what to do, as the United States government
appears willing to use the full force of the government to coercively promote
an agenda that is not supported by the people but which cannot be opposed without
risking the loss of vital financial resources.