Tony Abbott is being pushed by Homosexual activists who tolerate little deviance from their immoral orthodoxy
 |
| English: Photograph of Fred Nile, New South Wales politician. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
A press release from the Family Research Institute announces a study that "provides additional evidence that the practice of homosexuality, with its attendant lifestyle, shortens the life of practitioners by about 20 years."
Titled "Gay obituaries closely track officially reported deaths from AIDS," study results will appear in the journal Psychological Reports. The president of the Family Research Institute, Paul Cameron, led the project.
This report builds on an earlier one in which Dr. Cameron examined deaths reported in homosexual publications, tracked the ages of the deceased and averaged the results. The life expectancy of a male homosexual, it was determined, was in the early 40s.
Those results have widely derided by homosexual advocates.
Dr. Cameron says that his newest findings closely correlate to statistics compiled by the Centers for Disease Control.
Even using the word "homosexual" can infuriate because the word has traditionally carried a disparaging connotation.
It's been three decades since the American Psychiatric Association yielded to pressure and removed homosexuality as a category of mental illness. Time Magazine described the change as "an awkward compromise by a confused and defensive profession."
To be Politically Correct now, one must use the favored "gay" rather than homosexual, that old hate filled word. It's said that gay folks prefer it.
Much of the media and the scientific community plays along. A quick computer check of articles in the Chicago Tribune shows "homosexual" used in an article or as an index word 91 times. By contrast, for the same period "gay" was used 252 times.
Titled "Gay obituaries closely track officially reported deaths from AIDS," study results will appear in the journal Psychological Reports. The president of the Family Research Institute, Paul Cameron, led the project.
This report builds on an earlier one in which Dr. Cameron examined deaths reported in homosexual publications, tracked the ages of the deceased and averaged the results. The life expectancy of a male homosexual, it was determined, was in the early 40s.
Those results have widely derided by homosexual advocates.
Dr. Cameron says that his newest findings closely correlate to statistics compiled by the Centers for Disease Control.
Even if true, his report will be ridiculed as vicious, homophobic propaganda. It's not that there haven't been other studies concluding that homosexuals tend to die earlier. It's just that the subject is so emotionally charged that merely bringing it up is accepted in some quarters as irrefutable evidence of bigotry.
The International Journal of Epidemiology carried an article with the excitingly provocative title, "Modelling the impact of HIV disease on mortality in gay and bisexual men."
A dozen scholars scrutinized vital statistics for several years from a large Canadian city. Their finding: Life expectancy at age 20 for gay or bisexual men was 8 to 20 years less than that for all men.
Those figures aren't remarkable, knowing what we do about the devastating impact of HIV/AIDS among homosexuals. What was notable is what happened four years after the publication of the article.
The six authors wrote a letter to the editor of the publication in which their work originally appeared. They were displeased because — you guessed it — homophobic groups were using their data to intimate homosexual practices were self-destructive.
Medical advances have reduced the number of deaths due to AIDS. But AIDS is on the rise again in both Sydney and Brisbane
Their letter included little supporting scientific documentation. This differed greatly from their analysis, which was full of statistics, graphs, footnotes and references.
The motivation in writing that letter to the editor, was to placate homosexuals. The "we're here, we're queer" chant may not be heard as frequently as it was once, but homosexual activists and their sympathizers tolerate little deviance from their orthodoxy.
The International Journal of Epidemiology carried an article with the excitingly provocative title, "Modelling the impact of HIV disease on mortality in gay and bisexual men."
A dozen scholars scrutinized vital statistics for several years from a large Canadian city. Their finding: Life expectancy at age 20 for gay or bisexual men was 8 to 20 years less than that for all men.
Those figures aren't remarkable, knowing what we do about the devastating impact of HIV/AIDS among homosexuals. What was notable is what happened four years after the publication of the article.
The six authors wrote a letter to the editor of the publication in which their work originally appeared. They were displeased because — you guessed it — homophobic groups were using their data to intimate homosexual practices were self-destructive.
Medical advances have reduced the number of deaths due to AIDS. But AIDS is on the rise again in both Sydney and Brisbane
Their letter included little supporting scientific documentation. This differed greatly from their analysis, which was full of statistics, graphs, footnotes and references.
The motivation in writing that letter to the editor, was to placate homosexuals. The "we're here, we're queer" chant may not be heard as frequently as it was once, but homosexual activists and their sympathizers tolerate little deviance from their orthodoxy.
Even using the word "homosexual" can infuriate because the word has traditionally carried a disparaging connotation.
It's been three decades since the American Psychiatric Association yielded to pressure and removed homosexuality as a category of mental illness. Time Magazine described the change as "an awkward compromise by a confused and defensive profession."
To be Politically Correct now, one must use the favored "gay" rather than homosexual, that old hate filled word. It's said that gay folks prefer it.
Much of the media and the scientific community plays along. A quick computer check of articles in the Chicago Tribune shows "homosexual" used in an article or as an index word 91 times. By contrast, for the same period "gay" was used 252 times.
