Are homosexuals being honest?
As President of the Australian Marriage Forum, an association of volunteers dedicated to preserving the timeless truth of marriage as "the union of one man and one woman, to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life", I write to alert you to a valuable resource: the full-page ad we placed in The Australian on Monday 10 August, funded fully by online donations from hundreds of concerned Australians, giving our considered case against any change to the meaning of Marriage.
The online link is: http://australianmarriage.org/its-not-marriage/
A3 printed copies were delivered to Coalition MPs and Senators that day, and we would like to make copies available to any pastors who could use them – whether on church notice boards (as some pastors have already requested) or to enhance discussion of this vital matter in youth groups or sachool classrooms.
As you will see from the ad, we open by acknowledging that "all relationships matter. But not all relationships are Marriage".
We close by affirming that "Same-sex couples (the 1%) are free to live as they choose. But they are not free to redefine Marriage for a lll of us." They need to "Find Another Word."
In the body of the ad we give testimony and key quotes from people to make six main points, attempting to reframe the issue around the rights and needs of the child – which is what we care about most:
- Is it "Equality" if you force some kids to miss out on their Dad?
- Is it "Loving" to destroy the primal love between mother and baby?
- Is it "Tolerant" to silence opponents with anti-discrimination law?
- Is it Right to impose homosexual education on all our kids?
- Is it Honest to lie about what you are going to do with marriage?
- Is it Even Necessary, now that all couples have equal benefits?
As President of the Australian Marriage Forum, an association of volunteers dedicated to preserving the timeless truth of marriage as "the union of one man and one woman, to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life", I write to alert you to a valuable resource: the full-page ad we placed in The Australian on Monday 10 August, funded fully by online donations from hundreds of concerned Australians, giving our considered case against any change to the meaning of Marriage.
The online link is: http://australianmarriage.org/its-not-marriage/
A3 printed copies were delivered to Coalition MPs and Senators that day, and we would like to make copies available to any pastors who could use them – whether on church notice boards (as some pastors have already requested) or to enhance discussion of this vital matter in youth groups or sachool classrooms.
As you will see from the ad, we open by acknowledging that "all relationships matter. But not all relationships are Marriage".
We close by affirming that "Same-sex couples (the 1%) are free to live as they choose. But they are not free to redefine Marriage for a lll of us." They need to "Find Another Word."
In the body of the ad we give testimony and key quotes from people to make six main points, attempting to reframe the issue around the rights and needs of the child – which is what we care about most:
- Is it "Equality" if you force some kids to miss out on their Dad?
- Is it "Loving" to destroy the primal love between mother and baby?
- Is it "Tolerant" to silence opponents with anti-discrimination law?
- Is it Right to impose homosexual education on all our kids?
- Is it Honest to lie about what you are going to do with marriage?
- Is it Even Necessary, now that all couples have equal benefits?
The online link is: http://australianmarriage.org/its-not-marriage/
A3 printed copies were delivered to Coalition MPs and Senators that day, and we would like to make copies available to any pastors who could use them – whether on church notice boards (as some pastors have already requested) or to enhance discussion of this vital matter in youth groups or sachool classrooms.
As you will see from the ad, we open by acknowledging that "all relationships matter. But not all relationships are Marriage".
We close by affirming that "Same-sex couples (the 1%) are free to live as they choose. But they are not free to redefine Marriage for a lll of us." They need to "Find Another Word."
In the body of the ad we give testimony and key quotes from people to make six main points, attempting to reframe the issue around the rights and needs of the child – which is what we care about most:
- Is it "Equality" if you force some kids to miss out on their Dad?
- Is it "Loving" to destroy the primal love between mother and baby?
- Is it "Tolerant" to silence opponents with anti-discrimination law?
- Is it Right to impose homosexual education on all our kids?
- Is it Honest to lie about what you are going to do with marriage?
- Is it Even Necessary, now that all couples have equal benefits?
As President of the Australian Marriage Forum, an association of volunteers dedicated to preserving the timeless truth of marriage as "the union of one man and one woman, to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life", I write to alert you to a valuable resource: the full-page ad we placed in The Australian on Monday 10 August, funded fully by online donations from hundreds of concerned Australians, giving our considered case against any change to the meaning of Marriage.
The online link is: http://australianmarriage.org/its-not-marriage/
A3 printed copies were delivered to Coalition MPs and Senators that day, and we would like to make copies available to any pastors who could use them – whether on church notice boards (as some pastors have already requested) or to enhance discussion of this vital matter in youth groups or sachool classrooms.
As you will see from the ad, we open by acknowledging that "all relationships matter. But not all relationships are Marriage".
We close by affirming that "Same-sex couples (the 1%) are free to live as they choose. But they are not free to redefine Marriage for a lll of us." They need to "Find Another Word."
In the body of the ad we give testimony and key quotes from people to make six main points, attempting to reframe the issue around the rights and needs of the child – which is what we care about most:
- Is it "Equality" if you force some kids to miss out on their Dad?
- Is it "Loving" to destroy the primal love between mother and baby?
- Is it "Tolerant" to silence opponents with anti-discrimination law?
- Is it Right to impose homosexual education on all our kids?
- Is it Honest to lie about what you are going to do with marriage?
- Is it Even Necessary, now that all couples have equal benefits?