Boston city hall denies Christian flag, but allows LGBT flags

-

The city of Boston allows any group to schedule an event at the city council plaza and fly their flag next to the American flag. Any kind of group, that is, unless the group or flag is Christian.
Gay “pride” flags, transgender flags, Chinese Progressive Association flags, National Juneteenth Observance Foundation flags, and the national flags of any country, including communist countries, have flown over City Hall. But when Camp Constitution applied to have their day at the flagpole and speak on Christianity’s contribution to U.S. history, flying the Christian flag was specifically denied.
In September, Camp Constitution planned to bring speakers to highlight the influence of Christianity on American freedom and rule of law. The camp’s leaders wanted to offer faith-based ideas for racial reconciliation.
Camp Constitution applied to the city in July and gave several possible dates, including September 7, 14, or 25. The city responded September 8 with a rejection letter.
Property Management Commissioner Gregory Rooney sent an email to Camp Constitution stating that the city “refrain(s) from flying non-secular flags.” Rooney claimed the basis of this denial is the First Amendment prohibition of the establishment of religion.  
“The City would be willing to consider a request to fly a non-religious flag, should your organization elect to offer one,” Rooney concluded.
Liberty Counsel (LC) stepped in to defend Camp Constitution. “This denial is unconstitutional,” Liberty Counsel chairman Mat Staver said. “They only exclude religious flags while allowing other flags, meaning that they are discriminating against the Christian religious viewpoint.”
Staver wrote a demand letter to Boston Mayor Martin Walsh asking the city to stop discriminating against people of faith. “The City’s past and current practice (and permit application) provides that City Hall Plaza flagpoles are available for privately-selected flags to be flown upon request of virtually any private association or activity,” Staver wrote. “The City has never denied a request based upon the viewpoint expressed by the selected flag, until now.”
The city’s position reflects viewpoint discrimination, according to Staver.  
“Government must treat private religious messages on equal terms and conditions with private non-religion messages,” the Liberty Counsel demand letter clarified. “Government must treat all persons and groups seeking to use the forum equally, regardless of their viewpoint.”
Allowing equal access to the flagpole does not constitute the establishment of religion, Staver said.
“There is a crucial difference between government endorsement of religion and private speech, which government is bound to respect,” Staver later explained. “Private religious speech in a public forum where secular viewpoints are permitted does not violate the Constitution. Censoring religious viewpoints does violate the First Amendment.”
“Government officials cannot just cry ‘Establishment of Religion’ whenever Christians seek access to a public forum,” Staver pointed out. “The Free Exercise and the Free Speech Clauses also protect religious expression.”
“Where the city of Boston allows any other flag by numerous other private organizations, it may not ban the Christian flag as part of a privately-sponsored event,” Staver concluded.
Liberty Counsel’s demand letter schooled the mayor on the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling regarding the First Amendment.  
“Religious expression cannot violate the Establishment Clause where it (1) is purely private and (2) occurs in a traditional or designated public forum, publicly announced and open to all on equal terms.”  
The letter quoted a 1995 Supreme Court ruling that concluded, “Those conditions are satisfied here, and therefore the State may not bar” the Christian flag.
“The city has opened a ‘forum’ – flagpoles in front of City Hall Plaza – and the opportunity to fly privately selected flags on them pursuant to a permit scheme,” the demand letter concluded. “Where this is true, the government cannot then prohibit flags it deems ‘religious’ in nature.”
Liberty Counsel respectfully demanded that the city of Boston confirm in writing that they will allow Camp Constitution to have its event, including raising the Christian flag, “as a cultural celebration of the contributions of Christians to the City’s diversity, religious tolerance, and the American rule of law.”  
The legal organization also demanded that the city announce the event online, as per usual city practice, including a picture of the Christian flag.  
Liberty Counsel gave the city until September 27 to do so or else its lawyers “will take additional actions to prevent irreparable harm to the rights of our clients.”

Popular posts from this blog

Ontario Catholic school board to vote on flying gay ‘pride flag’ at all board-run schools

-
Image
A Catholic school board in Ontario will vote next week on a motion to fly the rainbow-colored homosexual pride flag at all board-run schools during the month of June. Halton Catholic District School Board (HCDSB) Trustee Brenda Agnew gave notice of her motion titled “supporting our diverse school community” during an April 6 board meeting. Quoting Pope Francis along with LGBT talking points about “equity and inclusion,” the motion calls for the Board’s Director of Education Pat Daly to “direct all HCDSB schools including the Catholic Education Centre to fly the Pride flag during the month of June starting with 2021.” The motion is expected to be voted on by the Board at their next meeting on April 20. With nine trustees, the motion requires five votes to pass. A tied vote results in a fail. The HCDSB states on its website that its mission is to provide “excellence in Catholic education by developing Christ-centred individuals enabled to transform society.” The Catholic Church, basing i...
Read more

Christian baker must make ‘wedding’ bakes for gay couples, court rules

-
Image
DENVER, CO ,  – A Colorado board has ruled that a Christian business owner must make wedding cakes for homosexual "marriages" despite his religious objections. Business owner Jack Phillips came under legal fire in 2012, when he refused to bake a cake for Dave Mullins and Charlie Craig , who had traveled to Massachusetts for a marriage license, and wanted to celebrate in their home state. They sued on the basis of a state law that prevents the application of religious beliefs if one owns a business. The Commission's ruling, which was issued verbally on Friday, orders Phillips to report every three months for the next two years on anti-discrimination training for his staff, and any customers who are refused service at his establishment. "I can believe anything I want, but if I'm going to do business here, I'd ought to not discriminate against people," said one of the Civil Rights Commission 's seven members in a public statement. Phil...
Read more

Australia: Gay Hate tribunals are coming

-
Image
Are Hate Tribunals Are Coming In Canada , it is considered discriminatory to say that marriage is between a man and a woman or that every child should know and be raised by his or her biological married parents.  It is not just politically incorrect in Canada to say so; you can be saddled with tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees, fined, and forced to take sensitivity training. Anyone who is offended by something you have said or written can make a complaint to the Human Rights Commissions and Tribunals. In Canada, these organizations police speech, penalizing citizens for any expression deemed in opposition to particular sexual behaviors or protected groups identified under “sexual orientation.” It takes only one complaint against a person to be brought before the tribunal, costing the defendant tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees. The commissions have the power to enter private residences and remove all items pertinent to their investigations, checkin...
Read more