Australia: Forgotten Children and Homosexual marriage
One of America’s leading public Christians
and recognised by Time
Magazine as
a leader among evangelicals, he has just published his own book about the
same-sex marriage crisis entitled We Cannot
Be Silent.
Until recently, there have been few
Australian voices resisting this cultural tsunami and the foaming rainbow wash
sweeping everything in its path.
It has fallen to a humble Toowoomba-based
family GP, my friend Doctor David van Gend, to pen what is a damning indictment
of the idea of redefining marriage in the Australian context.
Stealing from a Child – the injustice of ‘marriage
equality’ is
a very provocative title.
Doc, couldn’t you have toned it down a
little, I wondered.
But the leaders of the successful Irish
campaign to redefine marriage admitted in their book, Ireland
Says Yes, that our side’s concern for the right of children to be
allowed to know the love and nurture of both their mother and father, wherever
possible, was their “soft underbelly”.
Australian same-sex marriage activists know
this and that is why they are at pains to divert the argument away from the
rights of the child and keep it focused on the “loving couple”.
It is this adult-centred approach to
marriage that Dr van Gend challenges.
“Think of the child” is his refrain, a
thought totally missing in this age where truth is relative and we have lost
our capacity to reason.
Emotivism and story trumps facts and logic
as Australia sleep-walks into the most radical social and cultural change of a
generation.
Such is the inability of the fourth estate
to question the assumptions of same-sex marriage ideology, that on one hand
activists assert couples are the only ones affected by the proposed change but
on the other they parade what they call “rainbow families” through Parliament
House to convince MPs the kids are ok.
Van Gend’s book calls them out and says
they can’t have it both ways.
This is not about questioning anyone’s
ability to parent. But it is asking the inconvenient and obvious question about
the place of mothering and fathering in our society.
The demand for ‘marriage equality’ must be
considered in the light of the inequality it creates for others, particularly
children who will be forced to live a motherless or fatherless existence.
And this, not because of tragedy or
desertion, but because public policy decreed it so.
Activists point out that this is already
happening but don’t attempt to defend the ethics of deliberately requiring a
child to miss out.
But what is not happening in Australia and
represents one of the next prizes sought by rainbow activists is commercial
surrogacy.
Our prohibition on this will be impossible
to sustain if marriage is redefined in law.
This is because marriage is a compound
right to found and form a family. Two men cannot do so unless there are women’s
wombs freely available for rent and women’s eggs available for sale.
And our efforts to put the genie of
anonymous sperm donation back in the bottle will also fail if marriage is
redefined.
That we have to be reminded of the basics
of baby making shows how far society has slipped. As van Gend points out, a
baby is made from a double helix with one strand from her mother and one from
her father.
But while many typically selfish
Australians will be unmoved by the ethical minefield around assisted
reproductive technologies that will be turbo-charged if the marriage law is
changed, van Gend’s book canvases the plethora of other consequences
unleashed.
One that might move Australians out of
their ambivalence is an obvious consequence of removing the gender requirement
from marriage.
Believing they had substantively already
won, activists started rolling out the so-called “Safe Schools” program which
teaches children their gender is fluid.
Chapter 5 is entitled “LGBTQ sex education
at your ‘safe school’, blowing away the myth that same-sex marriage ideology
has no consequences.
Van Gend also examines the latest
scientific research on sexual orientation and gender identity, bringing clarity
to a debate mainly informed by a Lady Ga Ga song.
The final section of the book outlines the
very real threats to freedom of speech, association and religion.
And in a real life demonstration of this,
Stealing from a Child almost didn’t’ make it off the press.
The day before the book’s first public
launch, the printers OpusGroup, reneged on their contract citing the
controversial subject matter of the book.
Smelling a rat weeks earlier, the
publishers Connor Court, astutely had enough copies printed digitally ahead of
the national book launch tour.
The launches in Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne
and Hobart have so far met with highly positive feedback, if you're interested
in attending, the Adelaide, Perth and Canberra events
are still open for registrations.
Dr van Gend’s book is a tour-de-force. It
will be mocked and ridiculed by the other side but few, if any, will seriously
engage his argument.
Van Gend has given us the logic and the
vocabulary to respectfully argue with confidence for preserving the most
important civil society institution available to a child – her parent’s
marriage.