UK PRIME MINISTER “STREAMLINING” LAWS TO CATER TO LGBT COMMUNITY

-



Proponents of redefining marriage argue that legalising same-sex unions will merely affect the wording of the present marriage law. But what they fail to realise – or maybe what they realise but aren’t inclined to admit – is that the flow-on effects of redefining marriage are vast in scope and swift in transfusion.

Countries where marriage has been redefined all display the same damning evidence. The United Kingdom, one of the first nations to legalise same-sex marriage, is often the poster-child.

Earlier this month, during a speech at the PinkNews Awards, UK Prime Minister Theresa May unveiled a long list of plans to overhaul education, politics, and medicine in order to cater to the LGBT community.

Speaking at the Awards, the Prime Minister said: “We need to keep up our action, so we are pressing ahead with inclusive relationship and sex education in English schools, making sure that LGBT issues are taught well. We’re determined to eradicate homophobic and transphobic bullying.”

She also vowed to “streamline” the Gender Recognition Act, to make it easier for transgender people to transition.

She said: “We’ve set out plans to reform the Gender Recognition Act, streamlining and demedicalising the process for changing gender, because being trans is not an illness and it shouldn’t be treated as such.

Not long after her speech, Mrs May wrote a column for PinkNews, expounding on her support of same-sex marriage. Throughout her post, she made a pointed effort to say that her new plans were for the good of everyone:

“I want all British citizens to enjoy the fullest freedoms and protections. That includes equal marriage – because marriage should be for everyone, regardless of their sexuality.”

But how can these new mandates give British citizens their ‘fullest freedoms’? According to the Prime Minister, the United Kingdom is intent on creating legislation to induce gender ideology into the educational system and the medical community. Regardless of where one stands on same-sex marriage, it is obvious that these statutes will ultimately terminate fundamental rights, such as free speech or freedom of religion in Britain.

Furthermore, how will such mandates create ‘equality’? As highlighted in her speech in the video below, the LGBT community is already supported by a dearth of government-funded projects. Not only will these new mandates go above and beyond ‘equality’, but they overstep the silent majority, pointedly granting the LGBT minority additional rights to which the rest of the population will not be privy.

Redefining marriage will not just happen in a vacuum. As exemplified by the United Kingdom, it will directly conflict with the fundamental rights of the majority.

Why would one say ‘Yes’ to that?

Popular posts from this blog

Ontario Catholic school board to vote on flying gay ‘pride flag’ at all board-run schools

-
Image
A Catholic school board in Ontario will vote next week on a motion to fly the rainbow-colored homosexual pride flag at all board-run schools during the month of June. Halton Catholic District School Board (HCDSB) Trustee Brenda Agnew gave notice of her motion titled “supporting our diverse school community” during an April 6 board meeting. Quoting Pope Francis along with LGBT talking points about “equity and inclusion,” the motion calls for the Board’s Director of Education Pat Daly to “direct all HCDSB schools including the Catholic Education Centre to fly the Pride flag during the month of June starting with 2021.” The motion is expected to be voted on by the Board at their next meeting on April 20. With nine trustees, the motion requires five votes to pass. A tied vote results in a fail. The HCDSB states on its website that its mission is to provide “excellence in Catholic education by developing Christ-centred individuals enabled to transform society.” The Catholic Church, basing i
Read more

Christian baker must make ‘wedding’ bakes for gay couples, court rules

-
Image
DENVER, CO ,  – A Colorado board has ruled that a Christian business owner must make wedding cakes for homosexual "marriages" despite his religious objections. Business owner Jack Phillips came under legal fire in 2012, when he refused to bake a cake for Dave Mullins and Charlie Craig , who had traveled to Massachusetts for a marriage license, and wanted to celebrate in their home state. They sued on the basis of a state law that prevents the application of religious beliefs if one owns a business. The Commission's ruling, which was issued verbally on Friday, orders Phillips to report every three months for the next two years on anti-discrimination training for his staff, and any customers who are refused service at his establishment. "I can believe anything I want, but if I'm going to do business here, I'd ought to not discriminate against people," said one of the Civil Rights Commission 's seven members in a public statement. Phil
Read more

Australia: Gay Hate tribunals are coming

-
Image
Are Hate Tribunals Are Coming In Canada , it is considered discriminatory to say that marriage is between a man and a woman or that every child should know and be raised by his or her biological married parents.  It is not just politically incorrect in Canada to say so; you can be saddled with tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees, fined, and forced to take sensitivity training. Anyone who is offended by something you have said or written can make a complaint to the Human Rights Commissions and Tribunals. In Canada, these organizations police speech, penalizing citizens for any expression deemed in opposition to particular sexual behaviors or protected groups identified under “sexual orientation.” It takes only one complaint against a person to be brought before the tribunal, costing the defendant tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees. The commissions have the power to enter private residences and remove all items pertinent to their investigations, checking fo
Read more