GAY TRUTH

One of the doctors who wrote a searing critique of the Australian Medical Association ’s Position Statement on changing the Marriage Act repeated his call for the AMA to retract the statement following an address by Australian Medical Association (AMA) President Dr Michael Gannon at the National Press Club today. The critique has now been signed by more than five hundred Australian doctors including 26 professors and six past AMA state presidents and can be found at critiqueAMA.com. The doctors have urged the AMA to retract its Position Statement and to cease misrepresenting social science in a political cause. Queensland GP, Dr David van Gend said: “The AMA has misled the public on same-sex marriage. “The AMA’s Position Statement uses spurious evidence to claim a link between our marriage laws and LGBT mental health . "That is unacceptable from our peak medical body. “The AMA is also misleading politicians. Catherine King, the federal opposition spokeswoman for health, re

AMA director Gammon says there is no difference in s ame-sex parenting and children ’s outcomes. But is he correct? A closer examination of the American psychological association’s brief on lesbian and gay parenting says something quite different. In 2005, the American Psychological Association (APA) issued an official brief on lesbian and gay parenting. This brief included the assertion:  “Not a single study has found children of lesbian or gay parents to be disadvantaged in any significant respect relative to children of heterosexual parents” (p. 15).  This is AMA Gannon's claim: but does it stack up? The present article closely examines this assertion and the 59 published studies cited by the APA to support it. Seven central questions address:  (1) homogeneous sampling,  (2) absence of comparison groups,  (3) comparison group characteristics,  (4) contradictory data,  (5) the limited scope of children’s outcomes studied,  (6) paucity of long-t

A new motion picture now showing in Mexican theaters is exposing the public for the first time to a relentlessly realistic depiction of the dangers and harm suffered by children adopted by homosexual couples. Pink : It's not what they say it is , which debuted on two hundred screens this weekend in the Cinemex chain of theaters, is the story of a homosexual couple who adopt a boy, inevitably exposing him to the chaos and confusion generated by their promiscuous lifestyle. The movie's uncompromising portrayal of the gay subculture has provoked protests from homosexual activists in Mexico , who have   asked government officials   to prohibit the showing of the film in the nation's theaters. The federal government's National Council for the Prevention of Discrimination initially refused to act but has now asked the secretary of governance to increase the movie's rating to a more restrictive one (it is currently accessible to those aged 15 and up). It al