Posts

Showing posts with the label Gay hypocrisy

Allegations of harm: Unsupportive of homosexaulity causes suicide

Image
Throughout the fake gay marriage debate - one technique was constantly used by supporters of homosexual marriage - If you call homosexuality a sin, wrong you will cause harm to teenagers who will then suicide. The purpose of this argument is to shut down any and all opposition to the idea that homosexuality is good for society. People were abused, posters torn-down by those who pushed gay marriage. No debate No questions No arguments and if you do open your mouth you are a bigot.  There are many ways arguments can go wrong . Since the dawn of philosophy, scholars have fashioned lists of fallacies, probed suspect rhetorical devices, and teased out the troubling ways power interweaves with persuasion. These problematic properties can be wrong in a rational sense, making arguments invalid, and less likely to track truth. But they can also be wrong in an ethical sense. Argument can be deceitful, manipulative, coercive. In the twenty-first century, there is a new challenge to argument — or

Australia: Homosexual Hypocrisy

Image
Every day we see this rank hypocrisy in action. Let me just share a few of the obvious examples. The homosexual activists have screamed for decades now, “Keep the state out of our bedrooms”. Ha, there is no other group so intent on dragging the state into our bedrooms – and every other private and public place – than the homosexual militants. And then there is the homosexual agenda being daily rammed down our throats throughout the media, popular culture, academia, and the public square. They call this the right of free speech. But when our side dares to make our case anywhere in the public arena, all of a sudden it is no longer free speech but bigotry, hatred, homophobia and intolerance. Hypocrisy much? We actually had the Tasmania Anti-Discrimination Commissioner coming out saying that something like homosexual marriage should not be left to the “whims of the majority”. How very democratic. You want the masses to just sit down and shut up while you dictate what social policies