GAY TRUTH

The LGBTIQ lobby has promoted its case largely through "no difference" arguments : there is no difference between a man and a woman (" gender neutrality "); there's no difference between an opposite-sex couple and a same-sex one because in both cases love is the couple's bond and marriage is just a public recognition of that love; there is no difference between a child having a mother and a father and having two mothers or two fathers , again, because love is all that counts. Without question, love is important for children, but we are learning that other factors, such as complementarity in parenting between a mother and a father, are also important, even possibly because of epigenetic effects - different genes are activated (imprinted) by the different parenting behaviour of a man compared with a woman. All children, including those who will be homosexual, need both a mother and a father. Yet another consideration favouring children's right

Transgender - Politicians personal views don't match science A law that would allow transgender South Australians to have their gender formally recognised without undergoing surgery will eventually pass, Premier Jay Weatherill says. A conscience vote on the proposal was lost in state parliament on Thursday with measures to prevent couples being forced to divorce if a partner transitioned also defeated. The premier has championed the bill but was absent from the evening vote because of a trip to Finland to visit a nuclear waste dump . Mr Weatherill says  "As I understand it, there is a majority of people that support this bill and it will ultimately become law at some point, either later this year or early next year." Politicians ignore science - promote LGBT ideology  Yet Dr. Paul R. McHugh , the Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University and former psychiatrist–in-chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital , who has studied transgender

In an unscheduled move, the Same Sex Marriage, Prostitution and Euthanasia Bills are all likely to be debated in the Lower House of State Parliament  TOMORROW . We therefore encourage you to contact (at least) your local MP urging them to vote AGAINST these Bills. You may wish to contact several or even all of the MPs below. Please tell them you want them to vote against all of the above Bills in your own words. Your email only needs to be a few lines, but it is important that you are firm, yet polite. The email addresses of all Lower House MPs are:  MEMBER ELECTORATE      MAIN SUBURBS IN ELECTORATE EMAIL ADDRESS Ms Rachel Sanderson MP Adelaide Adelaide, North Adelaide, Prospect adelaide@parliament.sa.gov.au Hon Steph Key MP Ashford Plympton, Glandore, Edwardstown ashford@parliament.sa.gov.au Ms Vickie Chapman MP Bragg Cleland, Crafers , Greenhill bragg@parliament.sa.gov.au Ms Chloe Fox MP Bright Hallett Cove, Marino, Brighton bright@parliament.sa.gov.au Mr Tim Whetstone MP

English: Tammy Franks. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) The South Australian parliament has backed the idea of same-sex marriage ahead of a move to introduce legislation which is in violation of the Federal Marriage Act. Parliament's upper house on Wednesday passed a motion congratulating New Zealand on its marriage equality laws. Introduced by Labor MP Gerry Kandelaars , it passed by just one vote, with the support of two members of the Liberal opposition. One vote is not a majority and says nothing about the support of immoral homosexual marriage . It does speak of a moral lack and discipline with the Liberal party seeking to be immorally trendy. The vote came ahead of Thursday's introduction of a bill in parliament's lower house to introduce same-sex marriage laws in SA which has no authority to do so as it is a Federal Act not state based, hence the SA parliament is trying to force its immoral legislation down everybody's throat then embarrass those who don't

CANBERRA, September 19, 2012 ( LifeSiteNews.com ) - Australia ’s federal parliament has overwhelmingly voted down a bill that proposed to institute “gay marriage” throughout the country. The bill was resoundingly shut down in a vote of 98 to 42, but observers pointed out that the last vote had only 6 in favour. The movement of public opinion is also towards national legalisation, with a poll last year showing 64 per cent of 270,000 responses in favour of a change. The bill was tabled by Labour MP Stephen Jones who urged activists to “maintain your rage.” The bill did not receive unanimous support from the homosexual community. Homosexual Senator, Dean Smith voted against it, calling his vote “an honest acknowledgement of the special and unique characteristics of the union described as marriage.” Activists have shrugged off the defeat of the national bill, however, saying they have higher hopes for legislation at the state level. They are particularly looking towards Tasmania w