GAY TRUTH

The Abbott government got what it bargained for in having the ACT homosexual marriage law overturned. The High Court said that the Federal Parliament can pass such a law. This has been known all along. Contention had surrounded whether the Federal Parliament could enact a same-sex marriage law . The question hinged on the word ''marriage'' in section 51 of the constitution, which defined the scope of federal power in the area. The meaning to be given to ''marriage'' exposed two very different ways of interpreting the constitution. On the one hand, the High Court could limit ''marriage'' to being between a man and woman by taking an originalist perspective, that is, by reading the constitution according to the intentions of its framers. Alternatively, the court might take a more liberal approach by allowing the word to evolve. Opponents of homosexual marriage made much of this lingering constitutional uncertainty. Lawyers for the Pres

Photograph of Malcolm Turnbull, New South Wales Liberal politician. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) The ABC is reporting that: Federal Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull says the current Parliament may change marriage laws to allow homosexual couples to wed, to legalize homosexuality . 30 couples were drawn into faulty legislation, by the  ACT 's law to tie the knot. But on Thursday, the High Court in Canberra ruled that only the federal Parliament has the power to make marriage laws, declaring the ACT's same-sex marriage law invalid. Mr Turnbull says it is likely a private members bill will be introduced to Parliament proposing a change to the existing law, which allows marriage only between a man and a woman. "I think it is very likely there will be a conscience vote agreed to by the Coalition party room," he said. Is Mr Turnbull the leader of the Government or Mr Abbott?  "As to whether that would result in the bill being passed, it's probabl

Homosexual couples who rashly went ahead and wed last weekend in the ACT, and sought to influence both public opinion and the High Court will have their marriages annulled after the High Court ruled against the laws . Today the High Court in Canberra unanimously ruled that the laws were inconsistent with the Federal Marriage Act, and were therefore unconstitutional. The ruling is a victory for the Commonwealth , for the majority of ordinary thinking Australians who believe marriage is between a man and a woman, for Churches, for all religious organizations, for all church schools, church hospitals and other religious non-profit organizations and just ordinary people. The ACT tried to argue that its laws could sit beside the federal legislation because it had defined a different type of marriage between same-sex couples . However, the unintended consequences of this proposal was obvious but homosexual politicians who are zealots could not see they were setting up more problems for

More than a dozen homosexual couples legally marries in Australia under faulty ACT legislation. Western Australian Upper House MP Stephen Dawson was the first to marry with a midnight ceremony on the lawns of Federal Parliament . He says he has wanted to call his partner Dennis Liddelow his husband for a long time.  By having a ceremony in front of Parliament at midnight clearly portrays how homosexuals are going to treat marriage as a political tool or a symbol to achieve their ends namely the full legalization of homosexuality.  ACT Chief Minister Katy Gallagher who put forward this faulty legislation, saying she is encouraged by the number of people willing to get married while the law stands. The law puts people from different states at odds with state law, on a range oflegal issues but for homosexual zealots this is the exact reason why they do it, because they disregard the law and want to push their agenda.  Ms Gallagher says: "In terms of where we go from here

Nine Labor and Green Politicians are being allowed to change the definition of marriage for the rest of the nation? Outrageous!  A West Australian Labor MP plans to be among the first to marry his homosexual partner when homosexual marriage becomes legal in the Australian Capital Territory tomorrow. The MLC Stephen Dawson intends to marry his partner of 10 years, Dennis, in a small ceremony in the ACT at one minute past midnight. The new immoral laws being forced on Australia by nine politicians (Labor and Greens) allowing homosexuals to marry will be short-lived as they face a huge challenge in the High Court . The huge challenges is that these immoral relationships will not be recognized in different states on a whole range of issues, including financial, welfare, inheritance, death and other issues that only federal marriages can claim. Mr Dawson wants to sends a message to the community. In effect, he is saying, whether you like it or not we will force homosexual

Australian Coat of Arms (adopted 1912) (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Yesterday the NSW Upper House voted to protect marriage. For the 9th time, the attempt by radical activists to redefine the meaning of marriage in Australia has failed. In a 21-19 vote against the bill, NSW has joined Tasmania and the Commonwealth parliament in rejecting attempts to redefine marriage. Furthermore, the High Court decision , due early December, is likely to declare ACT’s attempt to redefine marriage as invalid. This would likely settle the matter for good, protecting marriage from any future attacks via state or territory legislatures. This would make the 10th such time activists have been defeated. Keep up the effort to defend children’s birth-right to their mother and father. However homosexual advocates don't obey nor support the rule of law. They care little about anything except themselves. They will continue to push their isolated immoral views, playing the victims, blame suicides,

English: Tony Abbott in 2010. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Please  email your federal MP  today urging them not to allow the definition of marriage to be tampered with. The rainbow swastika agenda is plain and clear. They care little for children and marriage, they only want to use Godly marriage for their own agenda to push acceptance of homosexuality.   Despite your great success in influencing the Australian Parliament ’s decisive rejection of same-sex marriage last September by a margin of 2-1, marriage is again under threat. While Opposition Leader Tony Abbott ’s personal view on marriage between a man and a woman is solid,  he said last week  it was possible for the Liberal Party room to move away from this as a party position after the election by allowing a conscience vote. Similarly, the Prime Minister Julia Gillard has also been consistent in her personal view that marriage is between a man and a woman, despite the Labor Party breaking its election promise and