GAY TRUTH

The objection goes something like this: “In the midst of all of your attention to details of various Bible verses, you’ve lost the big picture. The cardinal virtue that Jesus taught His followers was love. If you value love, what’s the problem with two consenting adults making a commitment to each other out of love? Love is love. To insist that homosexuality is sinful and to deny them the right to get married is simply not loving, and therefore not Christian.” So you see how the collective reasoning of the culture paints the Christian into a corner here. Any response which does not fully affirm homosexuality—no matter what the Bible explicitly says about the matter—is hatred, pure and simple. And Jesus calls us to love. And you claim to follow Jesus. So you’re an un-Christian, hypocritical bigot. Love as Unconditional Acceptance But the argument simply doesn’t hold water. And this is the reason: the wisdom of secular society has failed to define love biblically. To our self-indulgent

Debating Marriage: What's a " Hater " To Do? In the   Public Discourse   today,   Narrator   Principal Brian Brown writes on the need for marriage advocates to discuss marriage in a way that appeals not only to reason, but also to emotion, intuition, and imagination. Brown outlines Nathan Hitchen's document  You’ve Been Framed: A New Primer for the Marriage Debate   to suggests several methods of unifying marriage advocates "so that we can pursue a future in which we are no longer viewed as haters and bad guys." Hitchen argues that to change aspirations, marriage advocates must understand five basic things: Emotion , which interacts with reason in people’s moral imaginations; Narratives , which shape people’s biases about pretty much everything; Stories , which make things relatable and personal in a way no courtroom argument does; Metaphors , which allow the mind to easily process and retain complex ideas; and Memes , which are easily rep