Posts

Showing posts with the label Judith Butler

Judith Butler - who brought sexual confusion

Image
American feminist, queer theorist , and academic Judith Butler has been a leading pioneer in gender theory and really one of the main movers and shakers in the modern transgender movement. Her 1990 volume Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity is a crucial book in the development of all of this ideology of gender fluidity and the like. She argues that there is no such thing as men or women, and sex is a social construct . There is no masculine or feminine, and one’s sexual identity is fluid and flexible.  Sound familiar? Next, she places all religions together but rejects the historic role of Christianity simply because it speaks against the sin of homosexuality and all its derivatives. "What may be most important right now, however, is to communicate the dignity of the religion of Islam , and to do whatever can be done to include Islam in interfaith networks and mobilizations. We know that every religion has its fundamentalists and that every rel

Genderism – a new ideology destroying the family

Image
Karl Marx (1818-1883) (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Editor’s Note: The following address by German author and social commentator Gabriele Kuby was delivered earlier this month in Moscow at the International Forum on Large Families and the Future of Humanity. We are witnessing an astonishing historical shift. More than a hundred years ago, Marxism declared the relationship of man and woman in monogamous marriage as “the first class antagonism” in history. This “class-conflict” had to be overcome by destroying marriage and the family. So in 1917, Alexandra Kollontai , the first woman commissar of the Bolshevik Central Committee, set out to put this into practise through the exercise of revolutionary power: A law for the dissolution of marriage Legalization of abortion Sexual freedom for youth Legalization of homosexuality Integration of women into the production process, and Bringing up children in collective state institutions. But even Lenin soon realized that this