GAY TRUTH

Now that Australia has, in response to the vote in a postal survey, redefined the law of marriage to allow same-sex couples to be married, what are the implications for the religious freedom of those who believe this is contrary to God’s will? This paper will simply outline some issues, all of which will need careful further thought. [2] One preliminary point worth noting is that many of these matters are issues which would have come up even if the Australian public had not voted to change the definition of marriage to include same sex couples. Biblical Christians have been ‘out of step’ with the broader Western culture ’s views on sex and marriage for some time. [3] But there are some specific issues that arise with the change inthe nature of marriage, especially around the law on solemnising marriage. And there seems little doubt that the ‘moral imperative’ to approve homosexual behaviour given by the statutory recognition of same sex marriage ( SSM ) will encourage further oppos

We miss the truly redemptive force of 1 Corinthians 6:9 –10, however, if we allow ourselves to be caught up solely in the discussion of the meaning of arsenokoites. Once its definition has been established, we must surely hear the clear teaching of this portion of God ’s Word: 11 Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the LORD Jesus Christ , and in the Spirit of our God. The past tense “such were some of you” cannot be ignored. Paul does not address “homosexual Christians .” He addresses former homosexuals who were now Christians. A transition had taken place, a supernatural movement from the practice of homosexuality to the Christian faith . They had been washed, showing that their previous activities were sinful and required cleansing. They had been sanctified, showing that their previous acts had been unholy. They had been justified, showing that their previous deeds placed them under the wrath of God and made

The father of a gay man has slammed conservative MP George Christensen for his ' homophobic ' comments about lowering the legal age for anal sex . The father, who lives in Mr Christensen's north Queensland electorate of Dawson and is a Nationals supporter, took to the MP's Facebook page to hit out at the politician who said the law change meant older men could 'prey and groom' on 16-year-old boys.  Yet, this is a historical fact - well known. Even during Roman times this is exactly what older men did. That is the reason why sodomy was banned.  Historically, sodomy was also a criminal act against nature. What has changed? When did it not become a criminal act?  But the Queensland Government like other government have fallen under the powerful influence of the LGBTQ advocates who wish to pursue their sexuality without restrictions.  Thw Qld Government, in its postmodern mindset where there are no morals, no inherent worldwide

In a final judgment censuring state officials for not accepting legal redefinition of marriage in the state, a federal judge declared Florida’s voter-approved marriage protection law unconstitutional last week. U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle criticized Florida state officials’ failure to act in doing away with the Florida marriage law once he’d overturned it and lambasted them “for a history of resistance” against homosexual “marriage.” After the Supreme Court Obergefell v. Hodges decision "one might have expected immediate, unequivocal acceptance," Hinkle wrote in his 10-page summary judgment order Thursday. "Not so for the state of Florida ." Same-sex partners Jim Brenner and Chuck Jones were first to sue over the marriage law, later asking another same-sex couple, Stephen Schlairat and Ozzie Russ, to join the lawsuit. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) then filed a challenge as well for eight couples and other plaintiffs, and the cases w