GAY TRUTH

Homosexual activists have done a great job advancing their cause with slick moralistic slogans about equal rights, discrimination, and so forth. As we will see, few, if any, of the pro-gay marriage slogans tell the truth. They sound good to a passive audience, but upon closer analysis, they are exposed as half-truths and deceptive distortions. The activists have been able to get away with that because our fast-paced lives and sound-bite media provide the perfect environment for propaganda to replace truth. It only takes ten seconds to utter a lie, but it can often take ten minutes to provide enough evidence to explode that lie. The problem for the truth is that there is no such thing as a ten-minute sound bite (that’s why this is a book, not a slogan). Gay Marriage Arguments - False Premises  The questions below help expose the false premises behind arguments for gay marriage. Take a minute to marinate on each of these questions and consider how you would respond. If you are honest

PICT0165 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Harm is a relative term.  What might be considered harmful to one person might not to another.  There are different kinds of harm:  physical, emotional, spiritual, financial, etc.  Therefore, harm is a personal thing that is experienced and is a bit subjective.  So, when we ask how gay marriage harms anyone, we have to look at more than just one aspect. Marriage  has been universally acknowledged throughout history as a legal contract between a man and a woman in which there is emotional and sexual fidelity, along with childrearing.  But homosexual marriage would change this.  Since marriage is also a  moral  issue, redefining marriage is redefining morals.  Furthermore, marriage is an extremely wide-spread practice within any society and has many legal and moral issues attached to it.  So, when marriage is redefined, the society is dramatically affected.  Legalizing gay marriage means changing the laws of the land.  The ramifications are

Agenda, the homosexuals want acceptability, recognition, and approval. Homosexuals want others in society to think like them (and behave like them?).  They are working hard to change moral, social, and political opinion to be more in line with what they want.  They are not content to be what they want to be.  They want others to accept them.  They want others opinions to change and conform to their ideology and behavior .  What gives them the right to try and change society into what they want it to be? Animal kingdom:  Homosexuality occurs in the animal world; therefore, it is natural Saying that homosexuality is natural because it occurs in the animal kingdom does not mean it is morally correct.  Animals also eat each other alive, devour offspring, etc.  Should we imitate those things as well because the animals do it?  Of course not. From an evolutionary perspective how does homosexuality further the development and distribution of the human species ?  It cannot.  Homosex

English: This protester was on his own and letting Minnesota state Senators know his position on gay marriage. This is freedom of speech in action. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Many of you wrote to say you've read the new Public Discourse essay " Now that We are All Haters, " about the power of the mainstream media and the gay rights lobby to choose the language, the stories, and the narratives around gay marriage . In particular the power of the narratives that frame those of us who stand up for marriage and the Biblical tradition as "haters" and "bigots". I should point out (because a lot of you missed it!) this essay is by that other Brian Brown, the Princeton alum who runs  Narrator , a communications consultancy that "uses neuroscience and social network theory to build powerful support communities around products and causes." The other Brian talks about speaking to young conservatives, some of whom support gay marriage bu

In Great Britain the consequences of gay marriage become ever clearer . Parents of a 3 year old boy came forward to say state-sponsored child care workers told their son he could marry a boy or a girl. The letter said: "Many of your commentators have speculated as to what the wider implications of allowing same-sex marriages will be on society." "I was given a stark illustration of this at the weekend." "In response to my three-year-old son's question as to what marriage was, I told him that it was when a man and woman loved each other very much and wanted to spend their lives together." "My son then told me that 'boys' could get married, too. As he doesn't read the newspapers, I was keen to understand how he had formed this view." "Apparently, his carer at nursery, a homosexual, told the entire class that he had great news: when they grew up, they could get married to a girl, or a boy." "Surely, my son is too yo

Are there consequences of gay marriage ?   Check out this new video. Related articles Aussie Celebs Say “I Do” For Gay Marriage (pinkbananaworld.com) Empathy, or Lack Thereof (disperser.wordpress.com) Pro-gay marriage MPs get hate mail (theage.com.au) Teachers could be forced to promote gay marriage in classrooms (telegraph.co.uk) Poll: 40% of Americans Have No Gay Friends (newser.com) Carrie Underwood Supports Gay Marriage, Says God Probably Does Too (inquisitr.com) Obama's gay marriage support explained on 9GAG (conycontratodos.wordpress.com) NZ politicians on gay marriage (on the record) (liberation.typepad.com) Rodger Streitmatter: PHOTOS: 8 Legendary Same-Sex Couples (huffingtonpost.com) Pittsburgh mayor says he supports gay marriage, has had change of heart on the issue (pennlive.com)

You and I know that advocates of gay marriage are seeking to create an America in which good, decent, loving, law-abiding people are afraid to speak up for marriage as the union of husband and wife . It's intellectually and morally absurd, but our opponents have sought to silence debate, and to strip Americans of our core civil rights to speak, to donate, to organize and to vote to protect marriage as the union of one man and one woman. We are so blessed as Americans to have a voice like Frank Turek. Frank is a Christian apologist who has written a book opposing gay marriage. In his day job , as a former naval officer , he teaches leadership skills to Fortune 500 companies . If you do one thing this week, watch this video: It will tell you more succinctly than I can where we are now in America. A student of Frank's says, in essence, that he LOVES Frank's corporate leadership class, which includes teaching respect for diversity within a corporate culture . But

Image via Wikipedia The standard that establishes that matrimony should be celebrated between people of different sexes has an absolutely objective and reasonable justification, which consists in the interest of the Australian government in granting a privilege to unions that tend to continue the species. To argue that the civil code , is "unconstitutional" because it is "discriminatory" and violates " equality under the law ". The full and free consent expressed personally by a man and woman before a competent authority to celebrate it, is indispensable for the existence of marriage. The act that lacks any of these requirements will not produce civil effects. When a homosexual couple assert a "right" to marry each other they seek to argue that Australia is bound by international treaties to respect their "right of equality", which they believe translates to the "right" to "marry" someone of the same sex

In the battle to uphold true marriage in the face of increasing social and political pressure to endorse and approve gay “marriage,” Christians are likely to go to jail for their stance, says one expert. In his recent  commentary piece  for Catholic Culture, entitled “ Gay Marriage and the Next Gulag ,” Dr. Jeff Mirus, president of Trinity Communications, says that the “gay marriage lie” is the “perfect totalitarian wedge” for pro-gay “marriage” proponents to use in the face of “hateful” “moralistic prigs” who “seek to diminish the personal sexual liberty of others.” “The cause of gay marriage fits the myth better than most issues because it really does seem that those who oppose it are denying life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness to others,” says Dr. Mirus. “ Gays are well-educated, wealthy and — above all — a logically favored projection of our moral culture. To inhibit their happiness, for any reason, seems just plain wrong.” According to Dr. Mirus, the “key” to the matt

Image via Wikipedia A group of physicians has presented to Canadian Parliamentarians scientific evidence that homosexual marriage is a health risk to Canadians.   The heavily referenced brief titled “ Gay Marriage and Homosexuality , Some Medical Comments” warns that the new law will result in the further normalization of homosexual sex which has already resulted in severe health risks and related costs to care for and treat persons affected by risky sexual behaviour.     The document, signed by doctors in different disciplines from family medicine, dermatology and neurology, warns that anal sex as practiced by most gay men, has a large number of diseases associated with it, “many of which are rare or even unknown in the heterosexual population” such as: anal cancer, Chlamydia trachomatis , Cryptosporidium, Giardia lamblia , Herpes simplex virus, HIV , Human papilloma virus , Isospora belli , Microsporidia, Gonorrhoea, Syphilis, Hepatitis B and C and others.   Doctors who spoke w