Posts

Showing posts with the label gay behaviour

is Gay sex love?

Image
This is a common error made by those in the pro-homosexual movement.  It is an error known as a category mistake .  A  category mistake  is attributing the property of one thing to something else that does not have that property.  For example, to say "Blue sleeps faster than Wednesday" is to confuse an attribute of colour with speed and compare it to a name.  This error is very common among proponents of homosexuality.   Another example would be to say that " Gay sex is just love."   This confuses a sexual behaviour with an emotional condition.  They're not the same thing. Besides, if they were, then there would have to be a whole lot of love going on, as this quote would demonstrate: "Bell and Weinberg reported evidence of widespread sexual compulsion among homosexual men.  83% of the homosexual men surveyed estimated they had had sex with 50 or more partners in their lifetime, 43% estimated they had sex with 500 or more partners; 28% with 1,

Homosexual behavior is sinful but homosexual orientation is not? Really?

Image
In contemporary discussions of homosexuality, it is commonplace to distinguish homosexual orientation from homosexual behavior. Usually, the distinction goes something like this: Orientation refers to one’s inner disposition while behavior addresses one’s moral choices. John and Paul Feinberg state it this way: Homosexuality as a sexual orientation means that a person has a strong and abiding preference for members of the same sex and desires to act on that sexual preference… Homosexual behavior refers to specific sex acts between members of the same sex. [1] Some Christian ethicists take this observation a step further and argue that we must make a moral distinction between orientation and behavior. On this view, homosexual behavior is a choice and thus morally blameworthy. Homosexual orientation is not a choice and thus not morally blameworthy. This point of view has become routine even among some who identify themselves as evangelical. A couple examples to illustrate the point. D