Posts

Showing posts with the label Tim Wilson

Whose rights are more important? The child’s or homosexual parents’?

Image
If same-sex marriage involved only adults it would be much easier to accept it I wish that I could support same-sex marriage and I have "moral regret" that I can't. When we feel ethically bound to take a position that we know will cause hurt to others, we should - and I do - regret the hurt that causes. If same-sex marriage involved only adults it would be much easier to agree with legalizing it. One hopes its advocates are correct that it would send a powerful message from society as a whole that discrimination against homosexual people and ill-treatment of LGBTIQ persons or a failure to respect them is abhorrent. But marriage doesn't involve just adults; it also involves - and, arguably, primarily - children. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights defines marriage as a compound right: men and women "have the right to marry and to found a family." The "right to found a family" makes marriage the societal institution that recognizes and es

Pink Panza parade will not stop at homosexual Marriage

Image
Some people seem to think that a ‘ Yes ’ vote will make the homosexual lobby happy and that they’ll go away and spend the rest of their time traipsing from one wedding to another. However, nothing could be further from the truth. A breakthrough on marriage represents a shattering of all defences against the onslaught of the Pink Panzers . They will not stop but will brutally and ruthlessly exploit the gap created to destroy all resistance. The goal is to completely and radically revolutionise society’s understanding of the family unit. Every remnant of the traditional concept of family must be eradicated, So before we rush headlong to the end of the rainbow, it would be worthwhile considering what battles have erupted in other nations once homosexual marriage was legalised. Like New Zealand. Family First New Zealand has just been stripped of its status as a charity. And this is the reason why: The Board considers that Family First has a purpose to promote its own particular vie

Why I am voting NO - homosexual Marriage

Image
This is why I will be voting No to same sex marriage There's no doubt that central to the concept of family is a definition of marriage involving a man and a woman for the purpose of procreation. With only minor exceptions over some hundreds of years and across all the major religions, this is how marriage has been, and continues to be, defined. It's also true that about 98 per cent of Australians identify as heterosexual and according to the 2011 census figures only 1 per cent of Australian couples are same-sex, with surveys suggesting only a minority want same-sex marriage. There are more important issues to worry about. We should also forget the Safe Schools' postmodern, deconstructed definition of marriage where gender and sexuality are fluid and limitless and individuals are free to choose whatever they choose to self-identify as. No matter how much gays and lesbians might want to wish otherwise from a physiological and biological point of view, only men and women

Same-sex marriage could see Christians persecuted: ACT Senator Zed Seselja

Image
ACT Senator Zed Seselja will vote "no" in the Turnbull government 's postal plebiscite on same-sex marriage , arguing Christians and other religious believers could persecuted for their views on marriage and sexuality if the law is changed. A long-time opponent of same-sex couples' right to marry, the Assistant Minister for Social Services and Multicultural Affairs said the voluntary, non-binding vote would give every Australian adult their chance to express their view. He confirmed he would vote to support changes to the law in Parliament if the results of the plebiscite favour same-sex marriage. "Obviously there will be a vigorous campaign and I will be voting "no", I'll be voting against changing the Marriage Act ," he said. "I've long been on the record for that. I think some of the issues that have been raised about issues like religious freedom, we've seen in other parts of the world that when we do redefine marriag

Homosexuals authoritarian and intolerant - ‘Back gay marriage, beer companies, or we’ll punish you.’

Image
Shalt not 'Make Light' of Gay Marriage - A beer boycott Down Under shows how authoritarian gay marriage has become. We’ve known for a while that it’s a risky business to oppose gay marriage. Now it seems it’s perilous even to discuss it. In Australia, Coopers beer – which is delicious, by the way – has found itself the target of a bizarre, shrill hipster boycott after its wares featured in a Bible Society video debate about gay marriage. Andrew Hastie , the Liberal MP for Canning in Western Australia , and Tim Wilson , Liberal MP for Goldstein in Victoria, battle it over gay marriage. They drink Coopers Light as they do so. (Mistake. They should have gone with Coopers Pale Ale, a cloudy, fruity joy.) Hastie makes the case against legalising gay marriage (it’s not legal yet in Oz), while Wilson makes the case for it. Wilson is one of Australia’s keenest advocates for gay marriage – I’ve had a few heated chats with him about it – and he does a good job in the video. The s

Australians: Reason why millions abandon the Liberal Party of Australia

Image
Time Will embraces another two homosexual men in parliament.  This is the reason why millions of conservatives abandoned the Liberal Party in the last election and many more will continue in the future. The liberal party is now no different than Labor or the Greens. This level of homosexual immorality is an affront to all Christians, Muslim and people of faith.  Former Human Rights Commissioner Tim Wilson (Liberal ) has delivered an emotional pledge to push for change on marriage equality during his maiden speech in Parliament on Wednesday. The new MP for the Victorian seat of Goldstein, Wilson thanked his partner, Ryan, for supporting his campaign and shared the struggle that waiting for marriage equality has been for them both. "I know you have sacrificed so much for us to be here today," he said, fighting back tears. "For seven years, a ring has sat on both of our left hands, and they are the answer to a question we still cannot ask. No matter what happens he