GAY TRUTH

Homosexuals are so blinded by their own self-justification that they cannot understand what is harmful about sexualizing children, according to commentator-journalist Chad Felix Greene . The Federalist  published Greene’s essay pointing out that the LGBTQIA + community is both encouraging pre-pubescent boys to become drag queens and heroicizing those who actually do. Case in point:  nine-year-old drag queen  Nemis Quinn Mélançon-Golden, better known in licentious circles as “Lactatia.” The Montreal boy performs the usual lewd sexual gestures and gyrations, wearing false eyelashes, thick makeup, glittering women’s clothing, and wigs. Greene noted that the boy is heralded as the “cover girl” for a line of sexy fashions sold online by Brandon Hilton. I think this new generation of drag kids is brilliant and inspiring! @Desmond_Amazing  and Lactatia are the future!  @TheHouseofMann  is just making sure they look SICKENING! people will talk no matter what, might as well giv

Alfred Kinsey (5493900781) (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) OVERVIEW: KINSEYAN SCIENCE AS CULPABLE Alfred C. Kinsey has been likened by supporters to a “scientific” Prometheus - bringing the equivalent of fire from the gods to enlighten mankind. Singlehandedly creating a sexology movement, his Kinsey Institute is the foundation of the Model Penal Code and all modern jurisprudence relating to sex and morality.  But unlike Prometheus, Kinsey was fanned by his own base desires. Kinsey set loose fraudulent sexual fires upon the world that matched his own sexual psychopathologies and created a conflagration of human passions, released from the bonds of traditional jurisprudence and morality. His statistical lies were translated into laws that destroyed extant common law protections for women, children, and the family. His acolytes built upon his frauds a medical-psychological-educational-legal complex that is destroying our children and our society. If we are to halt our moral annihila

Below in red is an article from a homosexual counselor and psychologists. If you are prepared to read this excerpt from his book, you will note clearly that their desire for marriage is fake. They know clearly, they are unable to fulfill what most would understand are the requirements of traditional marriage. They want monogamous marriage initially, but after a while they also want multiple homosexual partners. Marriage is in name only. Instead, they intend to be driven by their sexual urges (or as the author says testoserone ie: lust) and not their vows or promises to each of a monogamous relationship. To say we are just like the failures of heterosexual marriage, heterosexual divorce and adultery is not the same. It is structurally different, biologically different, it is barren and it is built on lust not love according to this author below. The slogan - Love is Love has now proven to be a lie.  Ultimately LGBT folk care less about the vehicle of marriage, it was simpl

The father of a gay man has slammed conservative MP George Christensen for his ' homophobic ' comments about lowering the legal age for anal sex . The father, who lives in Mr Christensen's north Queensland electorate of Dawson and is a Nationals supporter, took to the MP's Facebook page to hit out at the politician who said the law change meant older men could 'prey and groom' on 16-year-old boys.  Yet, this is a historical fact - well known. Even during Roman times this is exactly what older men did. That is the reason why sodomy was banned.  Historically, sodomy was also a criminal act against nature. What has changed? When did it not become a criminal act?  But the Queensland Government like other government have fallen under the powerful influence of the LGBTQ advocates who wish to pursue their sexuality without restrictions.  Thw Qld Government, in its postmodern mindset where there are no morals, no inherent worldwide

Pitirim Sorokin , the founder of sociology at Harvard University , pointed to the regulation of sexuality as the essential first mark of civilization. According to Sorokin, civilization is possible only when marriage is normative and sexual conduct is censured outside of the marital relationship. Furthermore, Sorokin traced the rise and fall of civilizations and concluded that the weakening of marriage was a first sign of civilizational collapse. We should note that Sorokin made these arguments long before anything like homosexual marriage had been openly discussed. Sorokin’s insight was the realization that civilization requires men to take responsibility for their offspring. This was possible, he was convinced, only when marriage was held to be the unconditional expectation for sexual activity and procreation. Once individuals–especially males–are freed for sexual behavior outside of marriage, civilizational collapse becomes an inevitability. The weakening of marriage–even

The question of homosexual marriage presents the American people with an inescapable moral challenge. The words homosexual and marriage are inherently contradictory. The very fact that these terms are in public conflict demonstrates the radical character of the social revolutionaries that now demand the legalization of homosexual marriage. For at least the last one hundred years, America has experienced an unprecedented season of social transformation. Now, this transformation has been extended to experimentation with the most basic institutions and cherished principles of our common life. A conversation about “homosexual marriage” is only possible if the concept of marriage is completely redefined and severed from its historic roots and organic meaning. Civilization requires the regulation of human sexuality and relationships. No society–ancient or modern–has survived by advocating a laissez faire approach to sex and sexual relationships. Every society, no matter how liberal,

Homosexual sin is a grievous and heinous sin. While it is indeed true that all sexual  immorality is sin-adultery, fornication, pornography, homosexual sin is different. It is a more heinous and grievous sin because, as the Word of God makes clear, homosexual sin is contrary to nature (Rom. 1:26). Homosexual sin strikes against God's created order in every way and mocks God's design for procreation, thus making homosexuality logically self defeating. Those who suggest the Bible is not clear about homosexual sin have never read the Bible or have not been given the ears to hear what the Bible plainly teaches. The Bible is clear, so we must be clear. We cannot and must not waver in the face of seemingly overwhelming opposition. Although the world is changing, the Word of God is not. We must stand our ground on the unchanging Word of God in the midst of an ever changing culture. For even if the whole world says homosexuality is acceptable, we must stand our ground on the a

Homosexual sin is a grievous and heinous sin . While it is indeed true that all sexual immorality is sin—adultery, fornication, pornography— homosexual sin is different. It is a more heinous and grievous sin because, as the Word of God makes clear, homosexual sin is contrary to nature ( Rom. 1:26 ). Homosexual sin strikes against God’s created order in every way and mocks God’s design for procreation, thus making homosexuality logically self-defeating. Those who suggest the Bible is not clear about homosexual sin have never read the Bible or have not been given the ears to hear what the Bible plainly teaches. The Bible is clear, so we must be clear. We cannot and must not waver in the face of seemingly overwhelming opposition. Although the world is changing, the Word of God is not. We must stand our ground on the unchanging Word of God in the midst of an ever-changing culture.  For even if the whole world says homosexuality is acceptable, we must stand our ground on the aut