GAY TRUTH

Labor will introduce a private members bill aimed at legalising gay marriage, in a move designed to pressure Prime Minister Tony Abbott into deciding on whether Government MPs will be allowed a conscience vote . This is the 10th attempt in Australia to push the gay zealot agenda. Tony Abbott is to be commended for standing against this horrible form of immorality and sin into Australia. The USA is already showing signs of splintering the community. Forcing business to perform duties against their conscience for homosexual marriages. The USA government has come out and fined business like florist, chapel owners, photographers who in good conscience cannot support immorality being shoved down their throats. Deputy Opposition Leader Tanya Plibersek took the bill to Caucus this morning for approval from her colleagues. Does the opposition have nothing better to do then put up legislation that the Australian people have said a definite NO! The draft legislation is practically the same

English: Tony Abbott in 2010. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Prime Minister Tony Abbott says same-sex couples who married in the ACT knew there was a possibility their marriages would be annulled. Around 30 same-sex couples knowing that this legislation was faulty based on lies from ACT Labor and Greens politicians, were married in Canberra in the five-day window before the ACT's same-sex marriage law were overturned.  On Thursday, the High Court unanimously ruled that the ACT's laws were inconsistent with the Federal Marriage Act and were therefore unconstitutional. The ruling is a victory for the Commonwealth , the nation, thinking people, churches, charities, businesses, logic, morality, children, families and millions of ordinary Australians.  Mr Abbott says his position on the issue has not changed and he remains opposed to gay marriage . At least we have a strong leader, not like Mr Turnbull who is playing to appease both sides of the fence. Abbott correctly

English: Tony Abbott in 2010. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) What an astonishing offensive statement by the editor of the SMH. Any Christian  or non-religious person or MP who rejects homosexual marriage on grounds of logic, biology, evolution, Christian teaching, human history and common sense is labelled an extremist . The inference support homosexual marriage you are normal, object to it you're extreme. What arrogance!  The SMH also believes the refusal to allow immoral homosexual marriage is because of the moral preferences of one man, Tony Abbott ? Again SMH is seeking to twist the argument and the PM to make him look like a sexual Scrooge. Is this journalism or homosexual propaganda? After labelling normal fathers and mothers, young and old people who follow Christ and obey Biblical scripture to label everyone of them as extremist does not create "potential community support." Here is the quote from the SMH below : The Coalition so far has denied its MPs

English: Tony Abbott in 2010. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) September 10, 2013 ( Mercatornet.com ) - Same-sex marriage was a big loser in Australia ’s election over the weekend. Former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd sank beneath the waves with his rainbow colours nailed to the mast. Rudd began his campaign to unseat the incumbent PM, Julia Gillard , back in May with a born-again conversion. He promised that he would introduce a bill within 100 days of being re-elected and made gay marriage a centrepiece of his pre-election campaigning. Astonishingly, on the very threshold of electoral annihilation, he gave an interview to The Australian in which he insisted that same-sex marriage was his Christian responsibility. "It was not simply a question about policy but about my fundamental qualifications to be called a Christian,"  he said . Perhaps in Mr Rudd’s inner-city seat of Griffith in Brisbane fervour for same-sex marriage was running high. Perhaps outspoken support was

English: A woman makes her support of her marriage, and not civil unions, known outside the Mormon temple at New York City's Lincoln Center. Photographer's blog post about this photo and the protest. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) It may be that the Prime Minister Kevin Rudd is concerned his new-found position on marriage is hurting his standing with Christians. At last night’s “peoples’ forum” debate with Tony Abbott in Brisbane , the two leaders were again asked for their positions on same-sex marriage. It was interesting that Mr Rudd went straight to concerns about religious freedom in his answer saying the church should never have to conduct same-sex weddings. The church was not even mentioned in the question. After years of defending man-woman marriage, Mr Rudd reiterated his new view that there could be two systems of marriage: civil same-sex marriage and church-based marriage that excluded homosexuals. But what then does the “marriage equality” campaign mean if church

Hon. Kevin Rudd MP, Prime Minister of Australia (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Kevin Rudd promised he will fast-track same-sex marriage if re-elected. If the Prime Minister has his way, marriage could be redefined by the end of the year. But it will only happen if enough MPs vote for change. You can read below what he told supporters in an email released just minutes after the debate. Please email your local MP today and remind them of your support for man-woman marriage. Ask them to commit to supporting the current definition of marriage if they are re-elected. Kevin Rudd’s 100 day plan to redefine marriage would further undermine the idea that kids deserve, wherever possible, a mum and a dad. There is no practical discrimination against same-sex couples under Australian law . There is no need to change the marriage law . If we wish to retain marriage in its current form it is important that we vote for candidates, regardless of party affiliation, who support marriage. If your l

Official photographic portrait of US President Barack Obama (born 4 August 1961; assumed office 20 January 2009) (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott are to be placed under renewed pressure to support immoral homosexual marriage rights with the Greens intent on making this hated reform a key election issue. The party also wants to test Mr Abbott's assertion during a 60 Minutes interview last Sunday that he separates his Christian faith from his policy decisions. Greens deputy leader Adam Bandt has secured debating time in the House of Representatives next Monday for his bill establishing equal marriage rights for same-sex couples. The bill aims to remove references to the definition of marriage as being exclusively between a man and a woman but would not require churches to perform same-sex marriages unless they wanted to. A senior Greens strategist revealed the primary aim was to use the election pressure to ''encourage'' Mr Abbott to

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has sought to further remake his public image by declaring his own religious beliefs would never dominate his politics. He also stated that earlier comments condemning abortion were poorly stated and admitted that his opposition to homosexuals had changed once he had got to know gays. What does this mean?  Does this means his family dynamic will dictate policy and not Christianity? Supported by his lesbian sister, her lover, his wife Margie and his daughters, Mr Abbott said that when he claimed three years ago during a television interview that he felt ''a bit threatened'' by homosexuals, he had been trying to guard a family secret. He had only just been told by his sister that she was a lesbian. ''Now I couldn't talk about that then because it was deeply personal and deeply private,'' he said. it is irrelevant, if someone has a homosexual brother or sister in their family, will that change public policy? '