GAY TRUTH

Stephen Heasley and Andrew Borg, both immoral homosexuals from Australia , were offended and played the hurt victim card when they ordered their homosexual wedding programs. The wrong brouchures were sent.   They were accidentally sent pamphlets titled “Understanding Temptation: Fight the good fight of the faith,” which tells the truth of homosexual sin and how God sees and treats this sin. The brouchure outlined clearly how to avoid the degraded lifestyle choice of homosexuality and come to Christ in repentance. But because homosexuals reject all forms of natural law, biological design, and common sense - they believe their sexual desires are righteous and anybody who objects - they are happy to take to court, sue them and call them haters. The brochures were mixed up but that didn't stop them believing it was intentionally setn to them.  The programs were ordered online through Vistaprint. Borg and Heasley ordered 100 copies and paid around $80. They realized t

An Ontario judge reserved judgment after a motions hearing last week on the $104 million lawsuit against Bill Whatcott and others who marched in the 2016 Toronto Pride Parade disguised as “gay zombies” to distribute fliers on the spiritual and physical dangers of homosexuality. Whatcott’s lawyers, Charles Lugosi and John Findlay , argued in front of Ontario Superior Court Justice Paul Perell on February 8-9 that the lawsuit is a “ SLAPP ” or “strategic lawsuit against public participation,” which has no legal merit, is an abuse of process and should be dismissed. Lugosi and Findlay also argued that the Toronto Pride Parade is a political, government-promoted event. Thus, the actions of Whatcott and the “gay zombies” are protected by Charter rights of freedom of speech and assembly. LGBTQ activist lawyer Douglas Elliott and Scott Fairley of Cambridge LLP argued on behalf of the plaintiffs for an order forcing Whatcott to disclose the identities of his fellow “gay zombies

An emotional music video manipulating people to accept the sin of homosexuality has fooled again the emotions of homosexual supporters. Greg Gould's version of the En Vogue classic 'Don't Let Go' has attracted again an emotion response from people who support the homosexual agenda . This is about emotions not facts. This is about seeking to convince others by emotional manipulation . For some it works, for others it is just another attempt by homosexual activists to try to convince people that immoral homosexuality is something good, nice, wholesome and wonderful. The video shows a number of ways in which active homosexuals face a negative response from people. Why do people do this? Because homosexuality is a sin. Always has been and always will be. People are not fooled by this. An adulterer doesn't make his sin a lifestyle and seek every ones approval of his sin.  Parents struggle when their kids are captured by the hideousness of the homosexual agend

A new ANZ Bank advertisement tries to promote immoral homosexual relationships by portraying homosexuals stopping hugging and holding hands in public because a survey showed more than half of homosexuals Australians feel uncomfortable about showing affection in public. Why are they uncomfortable? Because people object to homosexuality. The majority of people who object to the immoral homosexual agenda are called haters and bigots. Homosexual zealots use this technique to beat down people's objections of immoral homosexuality.  Now the ANZ Banks wants to embarrass and intimidate people who object to immoral homosexuality. ANZ wants those who object to feel guilty. Their advertisement is saying - their objections to public displays of homosexuality are hurting homosexuals.   It is true that some people use profanity when affronted by public displays of the sin of homosexuality being paraded in front of them and their children. But the point here is simple - homose

No parent wants to intentionally reject their own child. No parent want to see their child hurt or sad. But parents do guide, advise, direct with wisdom and insight. Parents also correct when able when your child begins to think incorrectly and chooses a dangerous unhealthy lifestyle.  Shelley Argent is the mother of two sons. One is gay, the other is not. One will be allowed, under Australian law , to marry the person he loves, while his older brother is unable to marry as he has chosen a homosexual lifestyle. James Argent believed or was influenced to believe he was homosexual at 18-years-old. At that age moral confusion is rampant yet instead of a discussion and correction regarding the sinful unhealthy lifestyle choice of homosexuality his mother championed his sinful choice. Is love blind? Is she aware by doing this he will be pushed into a world that many want to escape from, regardless what the media and LGBTQ groups say? Shelley, is now the national spokesperson fo

The case of a Christian florist who was sued in the US for refusing to provide flowers for a same-sex wedding illustrates the need to protect freedom of thought, conscience and belief, Martyn Iles, of the Human Rights Law Alliance, a clinic set up by the Australian Christian Lobby , told a Senate inquiry in Canberra today. “This case tells a few clarifying things – first, that freedom of thought, conscience and religion or belief is a human right,” he told the Senate Select Committee on the “Exposure Draft” of a bill to change the Marriage Act to allow same-sex marriage. “All people have convictions of conscience by virtue of their being human. It’s not a right merely given to ordained clergy or institutions.” The committee is in its third day of hearings into submissions on the draft bill by Christian groups and civil rights agencies. There has been no argument that ministers of religion should not be forced to marry same-sex couples but gay rights groups do not wish to see such

Official photographic portrait of US former President Barack Obama who promoted levels of homosexual immorality never seen before in any country.  Reversing Obama’s LGBT -friendly policies won’t be easy, but it’s possible Are the LGBT gains under former President Obama irreversible? That’s the $24,000 question. Once an action has been advanced in the name of a sexual minority, can it be undone, or does progress have a built-in ratchet effect? The former president said in one of his numerous parting statements that he didn’t think the legal and social achievements of sexual minorities during his administration “will be reversible. American society has changed and the attitudes of young people have changed.”   He has stated the problem for conservatives neatly enough. Can America , can Western civilization, be moved back, or is the best that can be hoped for by conservatives a kind of ratchet effect? We can stop the juggernaut of sexual permissiveness from rolling on whe

Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) With Cardinal Dolan, Bishop Barron spoke about:   If the only thing gay person hears from the Catholic Church is you’re “ intrinsically disordered ” we have a very serious problem on our hands. (In New York City alone – there are several gay-affirming parishes that regularly sponsor “Pride” masses, organized lectures and retreats given by Catholic “gay” men and women who openly dissent from Church teachings with regards to homosexuality. How then, could anyone possibly believe that there are “gay” people who only hear they are “intrinsically disordered” from the Church – actually, this is probably the one thing they will never hear. In fact, at the 2017 LA Religious Education Congress, where Bishop Barron will also speak, “gay” Catholic Arthur Fitzmaurice, who has spoken at this event several times, has repeatedly stated that in terms of homosexuality, the language in the Catechism is “gravely evil.”) Bi

Bishop Robert Barron said in an interview Monday he wouldn’t “press” to reverse the legalization of homosexual “marriage” in the United States . And after criticism, he reiterated the point in a Facebook post Wednesday. An auxiliary bishop for Los Angeles , founder of Word on Fire Ministries and hugely popular social media personality, Barron made his remarks on The   Rubin Report . The show is hosted by political commentator Dave Rubin , himself in a homosexual “marriage.” Rubin questioned the bishop on his “personal feelings” about the Supreme Court’s Obergefell ruling that legalized homosexual “marriage”: “I assume you felt it was a wrong decision by the court?” “I do,” replied Barron. “But I don’t think I want to press it further. I think where we are right now in the States, I’ll apply the Aquinas principle. I think it would probably cause much more problems and dissension and difficulty if we keep pressing it.” But other countries need to see the church in the USA