GAY TRUTH

Any society which can so quickly fall for something like the normalization of a man “marrying” another man will soon fall for anything and everything. Pedophilia, bestiality, polygamy, Communism, Nazism, Seriously, why not? If we can’t defend marriage from this assault then everything, and I mean everything is up for grabs. It signals a dangerous direction for such a society. Our enemies will be sitting back waiting for us to self-destruct, which we will. If you remove the foundations from a house, the house can no longer stand. It is that simple. The rapid speed with which homosexual “marriage” has bullied its way into Western societies and found limited resistance is just the beginning. If we can offer no answers against this surely we can offer no answers against anything. As proof of this, the 2015 “Woman of the Year” is a man named Bruce! Say no more. Reality has left the West. In our society’s attempt to become “secular” and to rebel against God, we have not really gotten

“It is … it is going to be an issue.” With those words, spoken yesterday before the Supreme Court of the United States , the Solicitor General of the United States announced that religious liberty is directly threatened by the legalization of same-sex marriage . Donald Verrili, representing the Obama Administration as the nation’s highest court considered again the issue of same-sex marriage, was responding to a question from Justice Samuel Alito. His answer confirms with candor the threat we have long seen coming. Back in 2005, long before the movement to legalize same-sex marriage had gained cultural momentum, the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty held a forum on the question of gay marriage and religious freedom. The forum included major legal theorists on both sides of the marriage issue. What united most of the legal experts was the consensus that same-sex marriage would present a clear and present danger to the rights of those who would oppose gay marriage on religious gr

Sodom and Gomorrha, Alte Pinakothek, Room 23 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Homosexuality, a word for which there is no specific equivalent in the Hebrew Bible or in the Greek NT, since the concept of homosexuality as a “sexual orientation” originated only in the nineteenth century. Nevertheless, there are a few biblical references to people who engage in sexual acts with persons of the same sex. In the Hebrew Bible, the most explicit references to sexual acts between men are in the Holiness Code of Leviticus , where, under penalty of death, a male is strictly prohibited from lying with another male as he would with a woman (18:22; 20:13). In addition to these passages, the Bible contains two narratives in which men desire to have sexual relations with other men. The first of these is set in the city of Sodom and provides the derivation for the term “sodomy,” which in modern English is sometimes used as a pejorative term for “homosexual sex acts.”  In the biblical account, the m

Warning: Some people may find the images in this blog post disturbing. Viewer discretion advised. Earlier this week, our managing editor Steve Jalsevac   published a slideshow   with his photos from the 2011 Toronto Gay Pride Parade . Many of the photos were shocking. But one commenter pointed out a detail in one photo that many people probably missed.  The photo says it all: Naked men marching in Toronto’s Pride parade, showcasing what supporters cheer on as the advancement of “gay rights” and “ sexual liberation .” The naked men march past men, women, and yes even children. Everyone is encouraged to celebrate “diversity.” Oh, but what’s this? A young girl with blond hair in a turquoise teeshirt knows that something is wrong. The girl, maybe 8 or 9, doesn’t want to see naked men displaying their genitals . She feels assaulted by what she sees. She implicitly understands that her innocence is threatened by what she sees. She knows something wrong is happening

The Mexican Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the civil code of the state of Jalisco is unconstitutional because it defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman, according to reports in the national media. However, pro-family activists say the fight isn’t over yet, and that state lawmakers are free to ignore the decision and maintain the civil code as it is for at least 90 more days. In a unanimous vote by a plenary assembly of all eleven ministers, the Supreme Court sought to nullify article 258 of the code, which states that “Marriage is an institution of public character and social interest, by means of which a man and a woman decide to share a state of life in search of their personal fulfillment and the foundation of a family.” The Supreme Court’s ruling came in response to a complaint by the National Commission on Human Rights ( CNDH ) which reportedly criticized the law for violating the constitution’s guarantee of the “free development of personality” as a rig