GAY TRUTH

Washington, D.C., January 6, 2014 ( LifeSiteNews.com ) – In a shock to homosexual activists, the Supreme Court  halted  all same-sex “marriages” in Utah on Monday morning. The state began handing out marriage licenses to same-sex couples  last month  after Judge Robert Shelby's ruling that Utah's voter-approved constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman violates the U.S. Constitution . However, last week, Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes  asked  the Supreme Court to “stay” Judge Shelby's decision until the state's appeal makes its way through the courts.  "The decision by a single federal judge to redefine marriage in Utah is lawless," said Brian Brown of the National Organization for Marriage today. In  the request  for stay, Reyes argued that a stay is consistent with the Supreme Court's decision in  Windsor v. United States , which overturned a key portion of the federal Defense of Marriage Act , that marriage

English: Illinois Governor Pat Quinn addresses attendees before the opening of the 2010 Chicago Green Festival (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Washington, DC — The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) today celebrated the failure of legislation to come to a vote late this evening in Illinois seeking to redefine marriage, thus preserving marriage in the state as the union of one man and one woman. The bill's House sponsor, Rep. Greg Harris , announced this evening that he did not have the votes to pass the measure and would not bring the legislation to a vote. Assuming this is the case, the bill is thus dead until the fall when the Legislature reconvenes for a veto session. "This effort to redefine marriage in Illinois was one of the most fiercely contested legislative battles in the country this year," said Brian Brown , NOM's president. "This is a great victory for our allies and supporters, as well as Illinois families who have worked tirelessly with us t

BURIEN, Washington , - A volunteer working on a campaign in support of traditional marriage, as well as a pregnant bystander, were shaken up after a heated confrontation this weekend with a homosexual activist. Arlene Mark, a volunteer for Preserve Marriage Washington, which is urging voters to reject a ballot measure to legalize homosexual “marriage,” says the attack began while she was waiting in her car to distribute literature to other volunteers. According to Arlene, a man ran at her car, hit the back of it and ripped the Reject 74 campaign sign off the side. Arlene had taped the sign onto her vehicle so that other volunteers who were going to meet her in the parking lot could recognize her. Arlene related in a press conference yesterday that as the man tore the sign, threw it on the ground, and stomped on it, he yelled, “This is what I think of your f—ing sign! I’m gay and proud of it.” The man then reportedly shouted profanities at Arlene calling her a “b—” and screami

Image via CrunchBase NOM's President Brian Brown absolutely put a smackdown on Dan Savage the other day in their grand debate about marriage in Seattle, Washington . For those who don't know him, Savage is the foul-mouthed face of the gay marriage movement. To understand how badly Brian demolished Savage, consider this: Savage is complaining about the subject chosen for the debate (which his hand-picked moderator selected); he's complaining about the location (his own dining room table, also his choice); The New York Times reporter who moderated decided to write a kitschy odd-ball article about the encounter (including how he was drunk), rather than a substantive review of the debate, and Savage has buried the video of the debate down near the bottom of his own website. In other words, Brian so demolished Dan Savage that gay activists and the media now want to bury it. Let's begin at the beginning. You may remember when Savage was a keynote speaker at a national

Gay Sex advice columnist, journalist, and newspaper editor Dan Savage. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) At last it happened! The Great Brian Brown v. Dan Savage Dinner Table Debate actually took place! The tape is now live. You can watch me take on Dan Savage  here . But first you should watch the  MarriageADA interview with Julia Naman , one of the young teens whose faith Dan Savage decided to attack in an event billed as an anti-bullying initiative for middle and high school students . Many of you have already watched our debate and blogged your comments or emailed me. I want to thank you! One viewer wrote: I found Mr. Savage to be articulate and informed, which made Brown's response the more awesome. Brown clearly "won" the debate: He had tradition, logic, natural law, and modesty on his side, and was able to eloquently express this and made Savage look weak and pathetic. I do not dislike Savage, I felt genuine sorrow for him. Brown looked like the Pa

WASHINGTON, June 8, 2012 ( LifeSiteNews.com ) — Washington State ’s new gay “marriage” law has been halted one day before it was set to come into effect, after Preserve Marriage Washington (PMW) collected and filed over 240,000 signatures opposing the redefinition of marriage . The “marriage” law, signed by Governor Chris Gregoire , would have made Washington the seventh state to legalize gay “marriages.” Brian Brown , president of National Organization for Marriage , commended  PMW, stating that the successful signature campaign demonstrates the “deep support that traditional marriage enjoys” and “sets the stage for a tremendous victory for marriage this November.” “The signature gathering effort produced more signatures than have ever been collected by any referendum committee in the history of the state,” Brown declared. The submitted signatures will be reviewed over the next week, to determine if they are sufficient to qualify to put a referendum to protect tru

National Organization for Marriage (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) WASHINGTON, D.C. —The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) today commended the volunteer leadership of  Preserve Marriage Washington  on its incredible effort in collecting a record number of signatures to qualify Referendum 74, which gives voters the ability to preserve traditional marriage in the state. The committee turned in more than 240,000 voter signatures, more than twice the number of signatures it needed to qualify the measure to the November ballot. "We are so pleased and proud to have supported the Preserve Marriage Washington effort to qualify R-74, and we commend them for the historic signature gathering campaign they have mounted," said Brian Brown , NOM’s president and a member of the Executive Committee of Preserve Marriage Washington. "The signature gathering effort produced more signatures than have ever been collected by any referendum committee in the history of the state.