GAY TRUTH

In what is a testament to the marketing acumen of LGBT lobbyists and promoters, U.S. adults, on average, continue to believe that about 25% of the population is gay or lesbian,  more than five times the actual number . Overall, a full 90% believe in an inflated number, with 54% of Americans estimating that gays and lesbians constitute more than 20% of the population, according to a  June 17, 2019 Gallup poll . Only 8% of those polled come close to accurately estimating the LGBT population. Gallup Report, June 27, 2019 / Screenshot “Overestimations of the nation’s gay population may in part be due to the group’s outsized visibility,”  suggests  Gallup, citing a GLAAD report that found that 8.8% of primetime TV characters are LGBT.    Overlooked Gallup Data Tell a Bigger, More Important Story This most recent Gallup report was issued one day after the fourth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s  Obergefell  ruling which instituted same-sex “marriage” across the country. Two

A US Christian couple who own a video production company have filed an appeal against a law that has forced them to create films for same-sex weddings . Carl and Angel Larsen, from Minnesota , and their company, Telescope Media Group, filed an appeal on Friday to challenge a state law that allows the government to control the stories they tell. According to ADF International, which is legally representing the couple, the law allows Minnesota to punish the Larsens with fines and jail time "if they create wedding films consistent with their Christian faith while declining to create wedding films promoting contrary views". ADF added that they asked a federal district court to get rid of the law while their case proceeds. However, the court denied that request and instead ruled in favour of the state's motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which was filed in 2016. The Larsens have asked the US Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit to reinstate their lawsuit. ADF Senior Counse

Should a Jewish person be forced to serve a Nazi soldier? In the USA they might be forced or jailed.  The Supreme Court is due to consider the case of Jack Phillips , who says his refusal to bake for same-sex weddings is protected by the First Amendment The USA Supreme Court will hear in its term beginning October 2nd is the Masterpiece Cakeshop v Colorado Civil Rights Division, Charlie Craig , and David Mullins . It’s not every day that the justices hear a conflict between a sweets purveyor and both a gay couple and a government agency charged with policing discrimination. But the clash was inevitable.  In Obergefell v Hodges , Justice Anthony Kennedy inserted a caveat into his immoral opinion opening marriage laws nationwide to gays and lesbians. These judges took it upon themselves that they had the right to redefine marriage. A small group of un-elected individuals with no authority regarding the foundation and purpose of marriage chose to allow homosexuals to be ma

A homosexual legal group is appealing an employment case to the Supreme Court , the group announced Thursday, after a federal appeals court declined to rehear the case. A full panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals declined to rehear the case of Jameka Evans, a hospital security guard who says she was forced out because she is a lesbian.  She doesn’t conform to gender norms in her appearance and demeanor. Evans argues that her employer violated Title VII by discriminating against her because of her lesbianism, her dress code, her refusal to obey gender norms and her demeanor.  Earlier, in March, a three-judge panel of the court denied her claim . Lambda Legal , the homosexual legal advocacy group, is representing her in the case. Immoral homosexual groups who refuse "NO" from any judge want to push their agenda before the justices particularly if Justice Anthony Kennedy -- whose immoral and illogical support of all things homosexual -- is considering

This article outlines how homosexuals progressed to the point of achieving homosexual marriage  in the USA. It is worth reading to understand how sin got changed into a virtue - how words were changed. How Hollywood and politicians changed their minds.  You can also read the faulty logic that was used then promoted but not questioned. How science, evolution, common sense were all ignored. For example; the false argument saying historical inter-racial marriage was banned just like homosexual marriage. But the two cannot be compared at all as inter-racial marriage is still heterosexual whereas homosexual is male to male or female to female plus others because it is built on lust.  You'll note how language changed - negative phrases such as antigay - seeking to demonise those who disagree as bigots and haters. Why a small number of judges have given themselves the rights to change historic understanding of marriage based on an inheritance case. How Presidents led their

A group of three homosexual men living in Medellín, Colombia have successfully registered their union with the federal government, according to local media reports. The polyamorous union, which the three refer to as a “trieja” (or “thruple” – as opposed to “pareja” or “couple”) was registered by the city as a “Special Patrimonial Regime of a Thruple” (“Regimen Patrimonial Especial de Trieja”) according to a document provided by the group to the Colombian magazine  Semana . Proponents of homosexual “marriage” have long  denied  that a redefinition of the marital bond would lead to polygamy. However, defenders of the natural family as well as Supreme Court justices , have  argued  that the claim that people have a “right” to “marry” whomever they wish implies the legalization of such unions. Although the union is not a “marriage” under Colombian law, it is a regime of inheritance rights that corresponds to what are called “unions of fact,” which correspond roughly to “common

When a man and a woman make love, the miracles of conception and birth are possible. When two men attempt the same, the most glorious result possible is an anal discharge of semen mixed with fecal matter.   Despite the striking contrast, high-profile Catholics in positions of power and influence in North America are no longer able to detect any important difference between the two.  They not only accept being ‘gay’ as fully normal, they promote ‘same-sex marriage,’ a.k.a.,  anti-conjugal, anti-complementary, genderless marriage, as fully equal to marriage between a man and a woman. You already know many of their names: Catholic  Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau , for whom ‘gay’ marriage is a ‘core principle;’ Catholic  U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kenned y, who invented a national right for genderless marriage; Catholic former  U.S. Vice President Joe Biden , who has performed genderless marriages; Catholic  House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi , who asserts same-se

Newly appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch issued a  blistering dissent  to the Court’s decision to allow “spouses” of the same gender to appear on children’s birth certificates .   The court’s decision was predicated on the 2015  Obergefell v. Hodges case that legalized same-sex “marriage” across the country.   Because same-sex “marriage” is now the law of the land, the court reasoned that states must “provide same-sex couples 'the constellation of benefits that the States have linked to marriage.'" In particular, since the Obergefell ruling specifically identified birth and death certificates as two of those rights, states can no longer deny same-sex couples any rights related to birth certificates that are granted to opposite-sex couples. Obergefell v. Hodges  laid the groundwork for rulings such as this, going beyond establishing a legal right to gay “marriage,” to asserting all rights normally associated with marriage.   The constitutional basis

As of June 2017, 547,000 same-sex marriages have happened in the U.S. to date.  4.3% of adults in the U.S. identify as LGBT . That translates to around 10.7 million adults overall (taking into account the U.S. Census Bureau calculation that there are 249 million adults in the U.S.). There’s been a surge in same-sex weddings over the last two years. In June 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court incorrectly struck down state-level bans on same-sex marriage by a 5-4 majority as unconstitutional and said those states don’t have the right to refuse to recognize couples who have already gotten married in other states. The arrogance of the Federal court is appalling. Now destruction of marriage where anything goes is rising. Roughly half of cohabiting same-sex couples are now married, up from 38% before same-sex marriage was legalized in all U.S. states , a separate Gallup survey released last year found. Not all want to marry. Either way this shows the fast march away from God's clear pro

The United States ’ commitment to   religious liberty   is   being tested   and hostility toward traditional moral beliefs is on the rise, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito told a group of Catholic lawyers Wednesday night. Justice Alito repeated the words he had written in his own dissent in the   Obergefell case   legalizing homosexual “marriage,” telling the group that he suspected the decision would be used to “vilify those who disagree, and treat them as bigots.”  "We are seeing this is coming to pass," Alito said. He then referenced a famed Bob Dylan song lyric, "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." "A wind is picking up that is hostile to those with traditional moral beliefs," Alito said.   He told the audience that while religious freedom has been recognized in Congress and in the courts, attitudes are not so quick to change. The Supreme Court Justice described how a Democratic lawmaker  oppose