GAY TRUTH

CANBERRA,  – An Australian court has “reserved judgment” on whether a proposed law to allow “homosexual marriage” in one state is unconstitutional and has decided to wait until five days after it is to come into effect. Currently, federal law specifically bans “homosexual marriage” and a law proposing to allow it in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) is scheduled go into effect on Saturday.  The High Court, that has the authority to strike down the law, said it would consider the case again on December 12th. The ruling came yesterday after the federal government told the court in Tuesday’s hearing that a change to the law to expand marriage to include homosexual partnerings is unconstitutional. The block against “homosexual marriage” at the federal level is due to wording placed into the Marriage Act by the Howard government in 2004 that defines marriage as only existing between one man and one woman. In addition, the amendment added wording specifically to exclude homo

The future of the ACT's immoral homosexual marriage laws rightly hang in the balance today as the High Court prepares to hear a Commonwealth challenge to the legislation. The ACT Legislative Assembly with only the Greens and Labor (9 people only) passed the law in late October and the first immoral weddings are due to take place next Saturday in total defiance and presumption of the law. Nine people nine politicians think they have the authority to change the law of the land. The principle question in the case is whether the law is inconsistent with the Federal Marriage Act. The answer is obviously no. But homosexual advocates rarely accept no, but always seek to defy the law constantly. The Howard government and later Labor governments correctly blocked earlier efforts by the ACT to shove homosexuality and homosexual relationships on the nation. This displays again the level of arrogance by some state leaders. Constitutional law expert George Williams says this time the Com