GAY TRUTH

PRESTON, Lancashire , March 14, 2014 ( LifeSiteNews.com ) – An 18-year-old homosexual student, whose Facebook postings showing photos of injuries he alleged were the result of a " homophobic attack " went viral, has confessed that his account of the cause of the injuries was not true. Richard Kennedy, who studies acting at the University of Central Lancashire , admitted the whole thing was false after police confronted him with closed-circuit television video showing him falling face-first onto the pavement after leaving the Evoque homosexual nightclub shortly after 3:30am on February 26. Richard Kennedy In his attempt to portray the incident as an "utterly inhumane homophobic attack" on Facebook, Kennedy wrote beneath photos of his injuries, "Here is my face after a homophobic attack: four of my teeth are gone, not fallen out but deep inside my gums and cheek... my face is swollen, both my knees are badly injured and I struggle to walk...All

 I n his dissent in  United States v. Windsor , the Supreme Court decision invalidating the federal definition of marriage as natural marriage, Justice Scalia rightly identified as particularly outrageous the Court’s assertion that the purpose of the definition was a “‘bare … desire to harm’ couples in same-sex marriages.” The assertion is ignorant and bigoted to the point of being delusional. It’s not as if the justices hadn’t seen arguments to the contrary. How did they come to say such a thing? From one perspective the Court was simply doing what it always does when it establishes as a matter of constitutional law sexual autonomy rights that are favored by governing elites but lack any basis in the Constitution. It has the justice with the least professional shame ( William O. Douglas ) or the least intelligence ( Harry Blackmun , Anthony Kennedy ) put together some words that purportedly support the right. The rest of the majority then attach their names to what he writes

On the last day of its term, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today on two same-sex marriage cases. Both are important cases, and both will go far in redefining the most basic institution of human civilization. The Court knew it was making history. A majority of the justices clearly intended to make history, and future generations will indeed remember this day. But for what? In the first decision handed down today, the Supreme Court found that the Defense of Marriage Act , passed overwhelmingly by Congress and signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1996, is unconstitutional. Specifically, it found that the federal government’s refusal to recognize a same-sex marriage that is legal in a state to be unconstitutional. The Court left in place the DOMA provision that protects states from being required to recognize a same-sex union that is valid in another state. In the Proposition 8 case, the Court’s majority held that the plaintiffs in the case, representing the people of California