GAY TRUTH

The LGBT movement, including the push for marriage equality, has also helped upend repressive attitudes about sex, establishing nonmarital sex — and sexual behavior once thought perverse — as largely uncontroversial. (Last year, for instance, Teen Vogue posted a guide to anal sex.) Inherent in queer desire is the belief that sexual pleasure is a good in itself and need not be justified by reproductive ends, a principle enshrined in law by gay rights court decisions affirming that sex and marriage are not instruments for reproduction but expressions of individual liberty and dignity. Just as its loudest opponents feared, granting same-sex couples access to marriage has further aligned the hoary institution with sexual choice, helping sever the link between sex and diapers — at just the moment when abortion rights face their greatest test in a generation. Stonewall’s legacy isn’t just about making queer people look more like everyone else. It’s also, perhaps more mutinously, about ma

Hundreds of homosexual leaders, deceived gay pastors, gay theologians and advocates have denounced what they call the vicious, anti-LGBTQ manifesto “ Nashville Statement .” Deceived homosexuals who believe God loves and approves of their sin, responded with a liberal  statement affirming , sinful LGBTQ lifestyle and intersex people who believe in God don't need to repent of their sin as God accepts their lifestyle choice.  The 10-point treatise, titled Christians United , holds the following big lies of these apostate groups: “that every human being is created in the image and likeness of God and that the great diversity expressed in humanity through our wide spectrum of unique sexualities and gender identities is a perfect reflection of the magnitude of God's creative work.” In the first 24 hours of its release, the Christians United statement was signed by over 1,000 confused Christians from around the world, including gay theologians and leaders of some of the wo

WHEN Bride & Prejudice groom Chris was told his parents had refused to attend his wedding, he wasn’t surprised. What hurt more was the one thing his mother did do. On Monday night ’s finale of the Channel Seven reality series , viewers witnessed the 39-year-old being told his parents had decided not to attend his Palm Springs wedding to homosexual partner of three years Grant. In other words, this homosexual couple were involved in same sex sin for three years which broke the hearts of Chris's parents who know very clearly that this is a demonic inspired biblical sin made popular by the media inspired by the LGBTQ zealots.  And when Chris was given a video message of his mum explaining why she had refused, viewers’ hearts broke along with Chris’. Obviously, viewers are completely ignorant of the history and sin of homosexuality. Viewers have been sucked into this delusional sin filled world of homosexuality and anyone who disagrees with same sex sin - is brand

The first step in navigating your way through any complicated topic is to work out what the main approaches are and try (as best you can) to identify what is appealing about each position, as well as what might be a weakness. In our efforts to think through the fraught topic of same sex marriage , the Centre for Public Christianity has developed the following brief guide to seven approaches we’ve encountered amongst Christians wrestling with this topic. It does not claim to be exhaustive. It cannot capture every nuance. But we thought it might still be helpful to describe the various perspectives in a simple, convenient format, and invite readers to evaluate their own position in light of the alternatives. 1. Innovators: moving beyond scripture Innovators enthusiastically support same sex marriage. They do so with what they hold to be a generous moving beyond the Bible ’s teaching. For some this will be justified on the theologically liberal grounds that the Bible is a historicall

When a new North Carolina law limiting protections for LGBT people drew fire last spring from critics who described it as an unnecessary “bathroom bill” that violates the rights of transgender people, the state sued the federal government. Gov. Pat McCrory dropped that lawsuit Friday, but the matter is far from settled, as a debate over the rights of transgender Americans rages nationwide. On the same day that North Carolina sued the federal government, the federal government sued North Carolina, alleging its new law, House Bill 2 , constitutes sex-based discrimination in education and employment in violation of three federal laws. That case, filed by the US Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, remains active . In dropping the state’s lawsuit, Gov. McCrory’s attorneys noted that the arguments North Carolina raised as plaintiff will be raised again as defendant in the DOJ’s suit. They cited cost-savings for the state and time-savings for the court as reasons to drop the