Homosexual Spouses May Not Be Entitled to Workplace Benefits in Texas
Homosexual spouses may not be entitled to government-subsidized workplace benefits, the Texas Supreme Court ruled Friday in a unanimous decision that was quickly condemned by immoral homosexual groups.
The court overturned a lower court's decision that favored homosexual marriage benefits, ordering the issue back to trial. Those concerned for the country hope the case will help them ultimately destroy away the false and unbalanced U.S. Supreme Court's ruling legalizing immoral homosexual marriage.
Homosexual groups ranted and raved about the ruling as an "absurd distortion" of the illegitimate law regarding homosexual marriage.
But homosexual groups keep pushing their illogical one liners - Marriage is marriage and equal is equal - but not according to biology, commonsense and history.
Friday's decision was a major reversal for the all-Republican Texas high court, which previously refused to even consider the benefits case after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution grants homosexual couples who want to marry "equal dignity in the eyes of the law." But why should historic sodomy be seen as dignified?
The decision didn't block homosexual spousal benefits but said the U.S. Supreme Court decision did not decide the issue. The U.S. Supreme Court "did not hold that states must provide the same publicly funded benefits to all married persons," the Texas Supreme Court wrote in its opinion.
The case came from Houston, where a coalition of religious and socially conservative groups sued America's fourth-largest city in 2013 to block a move to offer immoral homosexual spousal benefits to municipal employees. The groups argued that the U.S. Supreme Court didn't declare spousal benefits a fundamental right of marriage, and that it should be up to states to decide.
The case came from Houston, where a coalition of religious and socially conservative groups sued America's fourth-largest city in 2013 to block a move to offer immoral homosexual spousal benefits to municipal employees. The groups argued that the U.S. Supreme Court didn't declare spousal benefits a fundamental right of marriage, and that it should be up to states to decide.
The pro-homosexual city tried argued that the homosexual marriage ruling meant all marriages are equal, so anything offered to opposite-sex couples must be offered to same-sex ones. But again, we see that homosexuals seeking adoption IVF because all their sexual relationships are infertile - not according to opinion but by biology.
Jared Woodfill, a conservative activist at the center of the case, called the decision a big victory for states' rights and religious rights. He said he hopes the case will eventually help push the U.S. Supreme Court to someday overturn its gay marriage ruling.
Ordinary Texan people will argue to the trial court that the decision to offer immoral homosexual benefits was an overreach by the Houston mayor's office that violated state law, and that benefits shouldn't be supported by taxpayers who would consider it a violation of sincerely held religious beliefs, biology, history and common sense, Woodfill said.
Houston has been paying the benefits and Friday's decision doesn't stop them, but Woodfill said opponents will use the ruling to ask a judge to block them pending a trial on the issue. Mayor Sylvester Turner said the city is reviewing the ruling but won't stop providing the benefits. Typical Homosexual zealots use the law when it advantages them but then ignore it when they loose.
Jared Woodfill, a conservative activist at the center of the case, called the decision a big victory for states' rights and religious rights. He said he hopes the case will eventually help push the U.S. Supreme Court to someday overturn its gay marriage ruling.
Ordinary Texan people will argue to the trial court that the decision to offer immoral homosexual benefits was an overreach by the Houston mayor's office that violated state law, and that benefits shouldn't be supported by taxpayers who would consider it a violation of sincerely held religious beliefs, biology, history and common sense, Woodfill said.
Houston has been paying the benefits and Friday's decision doesn't stop them, but Woodfill said opponents will use the ruling to ask a judge to block them pending a trial on the issue. Mayor Sylvester Turner said the city is reviewing the ruling but won't stop providing the benefits. Typical Homosexual zealots use the law when it advantages them but then ignore it when they loose.
