GAY TRUTH

New billboards highlight the lies of homosexual ‘parenting’ – prompting hostile reactions from leftists online.  Billboards bearing the straightforward message, “No child has two dads. No child has two moms,” have begun appearing across the United States to push back on homosexual adoption and highlight the importance of marriage. The billboards are the work of Them Before Us , a “global movement defending children’s right to their mother and father,” by “putting children before adults in every conversation about marriage and family.” The group highlighted the new billboards on its Substack, noting that even though “no person in any society has ever thought to object to (the message) for thousands of years,” after just a few days, they provoked a sharp, hostile reaction on social media. In the Substack post, Them Before Us’ Josh Wood took the opportunity to address the most common arguments in favour of homosexual “parenting.” He wrote that practices such as in vitro fertilisation...

Romania is a very socially conservative country; only 25 per cent of the populace supports same-sex 'marriage.' A decade ago, while walking the streets of Belgrade, a local tour guide asked me a question. Serbia had been an official candidate country for the European Union since 2012, and it came with strings attached: pressure to facilitate LGBT “pride” events. The guide was disgusted. “Why do they want us to have this?” he asked. Clashes between local, socially conservative cultures and the EU-backed LGBT movement have become common. Eastern and central European countries still, for the most part, reject the LGBT agenda; many have passed laws banning LGBT propaganda in order to respond to the massive push by LGBT activists to normalize and mainstream LGBT ideology, including transgender ideology, in their countries. Where LGBT activists cannot change the law, they seek to break the law and topple the system through civil disobedience. In Hungary, the ban on “pride” events t...

After backlash from LGBT activists, Bishop Franco Lovignana distanced his diocese from the post but declined to comment on the post’s content, further enraging leftists.  Gilbert Turcotti, the personal secretary of Bishop Franco Lovignana of Aosta, Italy, marked a local LGBT “pride” parade on Saturday by posting an image turning a rainbow “pride” flag into a swastika on his personal WhatsApp page, enraging leftists. Turcotti’s since-deleted September 26 post, coinciding with the Aosta Pride Parade, shows four “pride” flags meeting to form a swastika, with the caption “Questione di prospettiva…” (“A matter of perspective”), quickly leading to outrage from leftists, per Italian media. After backlash from LGBT activists, Bishop Lovignana issued a statement distancing the diocese from the post, saying that official posts are only found on the diocese’s official channels, but declining to comment on the post’s content, further outraging the leftists. This is the image posted on WhatsAp...

Pennsylvania’s Pennsbury School District socially ‘transitioned’ a girl and concealed it for nearly three years, and now her parents are urging Trump officials to investigate. Liberty Counsel filed a federal complaint with the U.S. Department of Education on behalf of parents whose minor daughter was secretly treated like a boy by Pennsylvania’s Pennsbury School District. The complaint states that school district officials adopted a male name and pronouns and maintained records, communications, awards, yearbook materials, and social media content reflecting a male identity for the student for nearly three school years without the parents’ knowledge or consent. The complaint states that the district’s actions interfered with the parents’ ability to direct the upbringing, education, and health care of their child and contributed to deterioration in the parent-child relationship. Since the Pennsbury School District receives federal funds, the complaint requests coordinated investigations...

The heterodox pro-LGBT group New Ways Ministry (NWM) has published a chronology of Pope Leo XIV’s “LGBTQ+ record,” including actions by which the pontiff has appeared to downplay Church teaching on homosexuality and gender. Early in his papacy, the timeline notes, Leo appointed Father Thomas Hennen as bishop of the Diocese of Baker, Oregon (NWM has misspelt Hennen’s name). The group highlights Hennen’s history of support for so-called “LGBTQ+ ministry,” including his part in drafting pastoral guidelines for “sexual and gender minorities” in the Diocese of Davenport, Iowa.  NWM praised this act at the time as “strikingly positive,” describing it as “synodality in action.” These guidelines did not make any mention of the fact that persons with homosexual inclinations are called to live chastely. New Ways Ministry noted that, in December 2025, Leo continued “Pope Francis’ tradition of inviting [so-called] transgender participants to the Vatican’s annual meal for the poor” and that h...

‘So, if you’re going to deny God is trans, you’re going to be denying the divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ,' the gender-confused Episcopalian preacher shockingly declared.  An Episcopalian preacher claimed that God is “trans” and that Jesus Christ “transitioned” after His resurrection in a March sermon delivered at New York City’s Cathedral Church of St. John the Divine. Rev. Flourish Klink, whose given name is Madeline and who identifies as both non-binary and transgender, began her “Trans Day of Visibility” sermon by suggesting “God is non-binary, but I’m going to go further than that and say that God is actually also trans.” “When God, who, as we have established, is non-binary, was born in human form as our Lord Jesus Christ, Mary said, ‘Oh look, a baby boy,” the preacher said. “God isn’t a boy,” said Klink, contradicting Sacred Scripture. “We have established this.”  “God was assigned a gender at birth, and later on it became clear that that gender wasn’t quite right,”...

Despite being blinded, mutilated, and sexually humiliated, the man escaped by jumping from his apartment’s third-floor balcony. A man who identifies as “transgender” was arrested after allegedly committing a brutal attack on his stepfather, leaving him blind and without both ears, according to multiple reports from Manaus, Brazil. The accused, described as a “transgender woman” by news outlets, allegedly raped his 61-year-old stepfather, bit off his ears, and gouged out his eyes. The severely injured man described the attack by his stepson as “satanic,” according to a police statement. Despite being blinded, mutilated, and sexually humiliated, the man escaped by jumping from his apartment’s third-floor balcony. Surgeons had to remove both of the man’s eyes, while his ears were not recovered, leading investigators to conclude that they were likely ingested by the assailant. The stepson reportedly claimed that the attack was motivated by his German stepfather’s refusal to accept the you...

Dr Jennifer Roback Morse suggests that there are two principal reasons why people want to keep the 'Born This Way' myth alive. In a recently released video, Dr Morse looks at the science proving that homosexuality is not fixed and unchanging and suggests reasons why people find the “born this way” myth so attractive. One compelling piece of evidence was the largest-ever genetic study published in 2017. There was something researchers simply did not find. “There is no ‘gay gene,'” Morse revealed. “None.” She reported that the lead author of this study told The New York Times that it “is basically impossible to predict a person’s sexual activity or orientation just from genetics.” Also, identical twin studies show that the “concordance rate” for homosexuality is only 30%, even though identical twins share almost 100% of their DNA. Morse showcased a clip from a presentation by a same-sex attracted expert, Dr Lisa Diamond, who explains that “sexual attraction shows a fair amoun...

  Objection Stated Paul does not identify homosexuality, which is indeed mentioned in Romans 1:26–27, as sin . This seems to be the thrust of L. William Countryman when he writes, “The idea that Paul was labelling homosexual acts as sinful can be upheld only if one can show that he used other terms here with an equivalent meaning.” 8   And in a public debate, this was ACLU board member and head of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State Barry Lynn’s common refrain when dealing with Romans 1, that Paul specifically avoided saying homosexuality was a sin. 9 Biblical Response This revisionist attempt is surely one of the weakest offered, for it requires us to believe all of the following propositions: first, that in the midst of demonstrating the awful sinfulness of idolatry and its punishment, Paul would insert a sentence where he switches subjects to something that, while possibly “unusual” in a social sense, is not actually sinful; second, that the context is t...

  Objection Stated Paul is speaking solely of Jewish purity laws, and hence this is irrelevant in a modern, enlightened society . Biblical Response It needs to be acknowledged from the outset, and this illustrates the constant inconsistency found among the revisionist interpreters, that this is an admission that the Hebrew Scriptures do indeed condemn homosexual deeds and desires.  After all, if Paul’s condemnation of such sinfulness is drawn from Judaism, this is a tacit admission that Judaism opposed homosexuality. We have addressed the basic contention of the allegedly limited application of God’s moral laws in our discussion of the Leviticus passages. It seems sufficient at this point to note how such an objection completely misses Paul’s context as well as his argument. Paul surely did not embrace modern views of either God’s law or God’s revelation in the Jewish Scriptures. He would not have held to the concept that the revelation of God’s holy will in Scripture was some...

Objection Stated Paul is only speaking of pederasty here, not of adult homosexual relationships, and hence the passage is misused when applied to homosexuality . This is the viewpoint expressed by Robin Scroggs in his work The New Testament and Homosexuality . 6 It is commonly repeated in liberal theological institutions. Biblical Response The exegesis of the passage has already addressed this common error. Paul speaks of “males with males committing indecent acts.” He does not say “men with boys” (and there are appropriate Greek words that Paul could have employed if he meant to communicate this idea), nor does the text give the slightest hint that this should be read into it as an assumption.  The desire expressed is mutual between both the lesbians of 1:26 and the homosexual males of 1:27; that is, there is no evidence whatsoever that this is written in reference to pederastic relation ships. Indeed, the mutual kind of desire seen in these verses utterly refutes the simplistic ...

  Objection Stated The Apostle Paul did not know about “inversion” and mutuality, and hence this passage does not have relevance today. Biblical Response There are two things to be noted in response to this assertion—an assertion that is, truly, at the bottom of almost every argument on the part of revisionists. The first is the unspoken, but foundational, assumption that the Scriptures are limited in their capacity and hence authority to the knowledge and experience of the human authors by which they were delivered to us.  The second is more overt: Paul did not know about “inversion” or the allegedly “natural” occurrence of homosexuality. Let’s begin with the second objection. Paul came from Tarsus, a major city in the Roman Empire. He was well trained, a learned man, familiar with Roman and Greek culture. He was obviously widely read in the literature of the day as well.  Therefore, the assumption that he did not know of people who professed to be homosexual as their pr...