Australia: Politician Warren Entsch has no argument to support immoral Homosexual marriage
Delaying a plebiscite on same-sex marriage is in danger of becoming a moot point for the Turnbull government. Unless it can win over Labor, any enabling legislation for a popular vote looks like going down in the Senate.
Australian Federal cabinet, meeting in Canberra on Tuesday, is considering advice from electoral authorities that recommends against a plebiscite before February next year.
Labor, the Greens, three senators from the Nick Xenophon Team and independent Derryn Hinch all oppose a plebiscite and their combined vote is enough to scuttle government plans in the upper house.
The Australian population want to be able to vote on this immoral issue. Having watched other countries, Australians know that the LGBT agenda will not stop at marriage. It is brutal with LGBT people using courts and police to enforce their worldview. Fines, jail sentences, companies shut down due to LGBT pressure.
"The plebiscite is pointless," Greens leader Richard Di Natale said. The Greens position prohibits all Australians to voice their opinion on this immorality pretending to be normal and natural. It is not pointless. It is fear that the vote will be no to homosexual marriage. Politicians do not want that to happen they want to bully this through against the will of the people like the USA where one judge decides for the entire nation what the definition of marriage is to be.
"The plebiscite is pointless," Greens leader Richard Di Natale said. The Greens position prohibits all Australians to voice their opinion on this immorality pretending to be normal and natural. It is not pointless. It is fear that the vote will be no to homosexual marriage. Politicians do not want that to happen they want to bully this through against the will of the people like the USA where one judge decides for the entire nation what the definition of marriage is to be.
"We already know there's overwhelming support for marriage equality in the community and in the parliament so it can't be seen as anything but a delay tactic."
Unfortuantely, this is incorrect as the polls keep changing and not everybody has been polled, hence the plebiscite.
Labor frontbencher Jim Chalmers insisted a vote in parliament was the simplest and cheapest way to determine the issue. But it ignores the poeple of Australia as these politicians are expressing a personal point of view.
"$160 million is an awful lot of money to spend on a process that at the end of the day won't necessarily be legally binding on the government," she told reporters at Parliament House. But the census debacle cost $410 million so $160 million is well spent.
Senator Hinch is also firmly opposed to a plebiscite but again this is a personal expression only.
"They didn't have a plebiscite when John Howard toughened the Marriage Act to put the words man and woman back in there," he told Sky News. The change was hoever brought about for reasons of clarity.
Senator Hinch compared it to the unsuccessful republic referendum in 1999.
"They will muddy the question and muddy the waters so much it will get a no vote," he said.
Coalition MP Warren Entsch, a supporter of same-sex marriage, believes the government should not fund the Yes or No campaigns if a plebiscite goes ahead. But he doesn't explain or give any reason. Already the media ignorantly ignores all studies that clearly portray homosexual marriage, homosexual orientation, gender theory has no scientific basis. So funding is needed to counter all the lies, the LGBT tactics, the false theories that keep emerging.
Labor frontbencher Jim Chalmers insisted a vote in parliament was the simplest and cheapest way to determine the issue. But it ignores the poeple of Australia as these politicians are expressing a personal point of view.
"$160 million is an awful lot of money to spend on a process that at the end of the day won't necessarily be legally binding on the government," she told reporters at Parliament House. But the census debacle cost $410 million so $160 million is well spent.
Senator Hinch is also firmly opposed to a plebiscite but again this is a personal expression only.
"They didn't have a plebiscite when John Howard toughened the Marriage Act to put the words man and woman back in there," he told Sky News. The change was hoever brought about for reasons of clarity.
Senator Hinch compared it to the unsuccessful republic referendum in 1999.
"They will muddy the question and muddy the waters so much it will get a no vote," he said.
Coalition MP Warren Entsch, a supporter of same-sex marriage, believes the government should not fund the Yes or No campaigns if a plebiscite goes ahead. But he doesn't explain or give any reason. Already the media ignorantly ignores all studies that clearly portray homosexual marriage, homosexual orientation, gender theory has no scientific basis. So funding is needed to counter all the lies, the LGBT tactics, the false theories that keep emerging.
