10-year-olds suspended for not wanting to participate in LGBT lesson

Two UK 10-year-olds were suspended from school for a week after asking to be exempted from a 'Pride' month lesson in their UK public school, Heavers Farm Primary School in Croydon, South London.

When 10-year-old Kaysey (pictured above), and another student, Farrell, asked if they could be excused from a lesson on LGBT 'Pride' month, they were allegedly subjected to accusations of 'homophobia' by the teacher.




And then, later, they were suspended from school by the principal of the school, Susan Papas, who allegedly subjected the children to more harassment and haranguing, and 5 hours of detention.

It is not only morally and psychologically wrong, it is also mean-spirited, to subject 10-year-olds to such treatment. 

A Selhurst Primary School which held a "pride march" has been threatened with legal action by a conservative Christian lobbying organization after a mum claims her son was forced to take part in the event against his religious beliefs.

Back in July, one Croydon mum called for Heavers Farm Primary School headteacher Susan Papas to resign over a "pride march" at the school, which was planned for June 29. 

While some parents criticized the event, others have spoken out in favor and head teacher Susan Papas stands by the celebration, stating it is important to teach children about diversity and acceptance.

Croydon North MP Steve Reed has backed the decision to hold the event, stating the school is "right to teach tolerance and respect instead of hatred and division".

But now another Croydon mother Izzy Montague has withdrawn her son from the school and pressed a formal complaint with its governors, claiming he was forced to take part “in an event that goes against our Christian beliefs”.

She is supported by Christian Concern, the same conservative evangelical organization involved in the Alfie Evans case, who says the family is considering legal action if their complaint is not resolved.



Kaysey stood up to the bullying tactics of the LGBT agenda! 

Christian Concern, an advocacy group seeking to restore the United Kingdom to the Christian faith, recounts the incident that led to the two students’ suspension:

"On June 20, Farrell, sitting next to his friend Kaysey in class, asked his year 5 class teacher, “Sir, please may I not take part in this lesson?” when the teacher handed out LGBT material for colouring. The teacher refused permission saying that the LGBT lesson was part of the curriculum. After class, the form teacher is said to have accused Farrell of using “homophobic language” for allegedly saying, “LGBT sucks and LGBT’s dumb,” which the child denies.
"Later, Ms Papas shouted at the two children in front of the class, according to Kaysey. “How dare you? You are a disappointment to the school,” Papas told the two children outside the classroom."

Kaysey and Farrell, two 10-year-old who refused to accept the LGBT's sexualized agenda.

The laughable irony is that the school's website claims that the 'British Values' of "individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs" will be reinforced and respected.

But, this obviously doesn't apply to those who don't want to be force-fed with the LGBT agenda, nor to Christians, nor to Muslims, nor to Orthodox Jews, etc...

Kaysey and Farrell should be applauded for standing their ground against the so-called 'adults' who teach and manage their school, and who appear to have resorted to the worst form of bullying because these children had the sense not to go along with their LGBT indoctrination program.



Mrs. Montague said: “After I complained about my young child being forced to take place in an event that goes against our Christian beliefs, the school’s attitude towards me changed completely.

"It was like being bullied. They stopped treating me like any other parent but were antagonistic towards me. I know other parents who are afraid to speak up because of how the school has treated me.

"I believe that they retaliated against me by unreasonably excluding me from the premises, victimizing my child and not taking my safeguarding concerns seriously.


“I wasn’t even trying to stop the Pride event. I just wanted my child to receive an education, rather than indoctrination.”