The Tennessee Natural Marriage Defense Act Is Back to fight fake homosexual marriage

-

Three years ago, Tennessee lawmakers introduced an amazing logical bill that would "defend natural marriage between one man and one woman," thereby barring fake homosexual marriages. The bill failed to advance in the Tennessee House during its last session, but state Republicans reintroduced the Tennessee Natural Marriage Defense Act this month in a new effort to prevent government officials from recognizing fake same-sex marriages.

The Natural Marriage Defense Act states that the Supreme Court's landmark decision in 2015 to legalize marriage equality is “void, and of no effect." The bill also states that marriage clerks are expected to deny any marriage license applications that would "enable the applicants to enter into an unlawful and invalid marriage" — "unlawful" in this case referring to any marriage that is not between a man and woman.

The proposed Tennessee Natural Marriage Defense Act would not just attempt to undo marriage equality. According to The Tennessean, the bill — if it passed — would require the state's attorney general to defend Tennessee's marriage laws in any future court challenges, and would protect marriage clerks from arrest if they deny marriage licenses to fake same-sex couples.

The Tennessean also projects that the state could become embroiled in a lengthy legal battle if this bill were to pass. The Natural Marriage Defense Act would likely face an immediate court challenge, and a federal district court could rule that the legislation can be enforced because the Supreme court now has more balanced conservative judges. However, given that the bill calls on Tennessee's attorney general to defend this legislation, the case could advance to the 6th Circuit Federal Appeals Court — and potentially even the Supreme Court.

According to The Advocate, Tennessee's Natural Marriage Defense Act was first introduced in 2016 by Republican Rep. Mark Pody and Republican Sen. Mae Beavers. After Pody and Beavers put forth this legislation, however, it was quickly killed by the Tennessee House Civil Justice subcommittee after it became clear that the state could lose up to $8.5 billion in federal funding by passing it. After all, this bill would and should ignore this false federal law — incorrectly codified by the Supreme Court's Obergefell v. Hodges ruling. This was a false incorrect decision pushed by one judge who was biased, who herself married a homosexual couple who are now in jail for male rape.


"I believe I’m supposed to be speaking to the unsaved, to the people that are performing same-sex marriages, to the people involved in same-sex marriage, it is wicked, it is wrong and I am doing the best I can to warn them,” Pody said at an event in Nashville at the time.

Popular posts from this blog

Ontario Catholic school board to vote on flying gay ‘pride flag’ at all board-run schools

-
Image
A Catholic school board in Ontario will vote next week on a motion to fly the rainbow-colored homosexual pride flag at all board-run schools during the month of June. Halton Catholic District School Board (HCDSB) Trustee Brenda Agnew gave notice of her motion titled “supporting our diverse school community” during an April 6 board meeting. Quoting Pope Francis along with LGBT talking points about “equity and inclusion,” the motion calls for the Board’s Director of Education Pat Daly to “direct all HCDSB schools including the Catholic Education Centre to fly the Pride flag during the month of June starting with 2021.” The motion is expected to be voted on by the Board at their next meeting on April 20. With nine trustees, the motion requires five votes to pass. A tied vote results in a fail. The HCDSB states on its website that its mission is to provide “excellence in Catholic education by developing Christ-centred individuals enabled to transform society.” The Catholic Church, basing i
Read more

Christian baker must make ‘wedding’ bakes for gay couples, court rules

-
Image
DENVER, CO ,  – A Colorado board has ruled that a Christian business owner must make wedding cakes for homosexual "marriages" despite his religious objections. Business owner Jack Phillips came under legal fire in 2012, when he refused to bake a cake for Dave Mullins and Charlie Craig , who had traveled to Massachusetts for a marriage license, and wanted to celebrate in their home state. They sued on the basis of a state law that prevents the application of religious beliefs if one owns a business. The Commission's ruling, which was issued verbally on Friday, orders Phillips to report every three months for the next two years on anti-discrimination training for his staff, and any customers who are refused service at his establishment. "I can believe anything I want, but if I'm going to do business here, I'd ought to not discriminate against people," said one of the Civil Rights Commission 's seven members in a public statement. Phil
Read more

Australia: Gay Hate tribunals are coming

-
Image
Are Hate Tribunals Are Coming In Canada , it is considered discriminatory to say that marriage is between a man and a woman or that every child should know and be raised by his or her biological married parents.  It is not just politically incorrect in Canada to say so; you can be saddled with tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees, fined, and forced to take sensitivity training. Anyone who is offended by something you have said or written can make a complaint to the Human Rights Commissions and Tribunals. In Canada, these organizations police speech, penalizing citizens for any expression deemed in opposition to particular sexual behaviors or protected groups identified under “sexual orientation.” It takes only one complaint against a person to be brought before the tribunal, costing the defendant tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees. The commissions have the power to enter private residences and remove all items pertinent to their investigations, checking fo
Read more