Why should there be homosexual painted road at Taylor Square in Sydney?



Why should Taylor Square get a new blatant homosexual promotional pedestrian crossing? Why is the City of Sydney council, five years after the original was deemed a safety risk and controversially ripped up seeking to do this again? the answer is that the LGBT agenda trumps common sense objections. This is simply outrageous behaviour by a city council.

The first rainbow crossing was painted across Oxford Street in 2013 to mark 35 years of the immoral Homosexual Mardi Gras which has brought disgrace upon Sydney. It was agreed between the Government and Council it could stay for one month only. When it was removed, typically the LGBT mob were outraged. 

In defiance of public opinion, Lord Mayor Clover Moore said the crossing would be reinstated nearby at the corner of Bourke and Campbell streets this year in "a victory" for the LGBTIQ community. More has chosen sides and sees this as a victory for one group against another group. Is this the role of the office of Mayor - to govern for all or one group?

  • Why should this one community group be given the right to use a public road to promote their immoral agenda?  
  • Will other groups also be given the same opportunity? 
  • Can the Muslims be permitted to have their roads painted in front of their mosque? 
  • Can churches have crosses painted on road in front of their buildings?
  • Can Football teams have their roads painted?



Cr Moore will ask the council next Monday to endorse funding for the immoral homosexual road promotion, at an estimated cost of $24,000. Should this money be spent on more worthy projects? 

The original rainbow crossing was trialled for one month before it was tarred over late one night at the direction of then NSW roads minister Duncan Gay. The removal cost $30,000. Permission was given by the NSW Government to the City Council for exactly one month and the Council promised it would be removed on time -but they ignored that requirement because they wanted it to be permanent. It cost the government to remove it safely at night.

Residents have already stated this is an outrageous waste of money that could be better spent on feeding and housing programs for the homeless. Businesses have already expressed disagreement with the project and are demanding the council focus on its job not on LGBT ideology. 



Popular posts from this blog

Ontario Catholic school board to vote on flying gay ‘pride flag’ at all board-run schools

Christian baker must make ‘wedding’ bakes for gay couples, court rules

Australia: Gay Hate tribunals are coming