GAY TRUTH

Uniting Church in Australia (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Mr Munson is a Minister a long-term advocate for marriage equality  and chose to marry homosexual couples in ACT recently before the legislation was thrown out by the High Court. Munson works with the Uniting Church as a locum and justified his actions in an ABC article. We will kindly address his justification to see if it is supported by scripture.   LOOK AT MUNSON'S LOGIC 1. " Being gay or lesbian, bi, whatever, is just who we are," he said. "It is not something people choose to do, it is just who we are. Response : This is the 'born gay' argument or the 'gay gene' argument supported by Lady Gaga but not the Bible. The Bible does state we are ALL born in sin and this would include homosexuals, bi, or lesbians. The Bible also calls everybody to repent of sin and come to Christ. The Bible does not call us to celebrate our sin but repent of our sin. Homosexuality and lesbianism is listed cl

CANBERRA,  – An Australian court has “reserved judgment” on whether a proposed law to allow “homosexual marriage” in one state is unconstitutional and has decided to wait until five days after it is to come into effect. Currently, federal law specifically bans “homosexual marriage” and a law proposing to allow it in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) is scheduled go into effect on Saturday.  The High Court, that has the authority to strike down the law, said it would consider the case again on December 12th. The ruling came yesterday after the federal government told the court in Tuesday’s hearing that a change to the law to expand marriage to include homosexual partnerings is unconstitutional. The block against “homosexual marriage” at the federal level is due to wording placed into the Marriage Act by the Howard government in 2004 that defines marriage as only existing between one man and one woman. In addition, the amendment added wording specifically to exclude homo

The future of the ACT's immoral homosexual marriage laws rightly hang in the balance today as the High Court prepares to hear a Commonwealth challenge to the legislation. The ACT Legislative Assembly with only the Greens and Labor (9 people only) passed the law in late October and the first immoral weddings are due to take place next Saturday in total defiance and presumption of the law. Nine people nine politicians think they have the authority to change the law of the land. The principle question in the case is whether the law is inconsistent with the Federal Marriage Act. The answer is obviously no. But homosexual advocates rarely accept no, but always seek to defy the law constantly. The Howard government and later Labor governments correctly blocked earlier efforts by the ACT to shove homosexuality and homosexual relationships on the nation. This displays again the level of arrogance by some state leaders. Constitutional law expert George Williams says this time the Com

SYDNEY , Australia , November 19, 2013 ( LifeSiteNews.com ) - Members of the State Legislative Council of New South Wales , Australia voted earlier this week by a narrow margin of 21 to 19 to uphold the true meaning of marriage.  Most of the MLCs who voted against the Same-Sex Marriage Bill 2013 pointed out that marriage comes under the jurisdiction of the federal government, and that a state-level redefinition of marriage would not withstand the inevitable legal challenge.  Most of the MLCs who voted against the Same-Sex Marriage Bill 2013 pointed out that marriage comes under the jurisdiction of the federal government, and that a state-level redefinition of marriage would not withstand the inevitable legal challenge. Paul Green of the Christian Democratic Party noted that marriage has been under federal jurisdiction since 1961. "Yet here we are deliberately attempting to create a law that clashes with the Federal Marriage Act. Here we are moving backwards on harmon

English: Photograph of Fred Nile, New South Wales politician. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Typical of the homosexual advocates, they try to blame the oppression on one person while not realizing the of the culture are at odds with their immorality.  Whether it be Mr Abbott or Fred Nile , this is a standard tactic to make them look like bullies, backward people, enforcing their own personal moral on the nation. When you don't have a logical argument based on history, moral law, or biological law you tell an emotional story.  When God's law does not change you try to tell an emotional story to engage a persons emotions that seek to over-rule the laws of God , the laws of the land and common sense. You dress up your story and try to appeal to the heart in order to be accepted. All logic goes out the window. If murderers, paedofiles, people smugglers tried this approach people would laugh, but shows like Glee, Will and Grace constantly play this emotional fiddle. Fre

Australian Coat of Arms (adopted 1912) (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Yesterday the NSW Upper House voted to protect marriage. For the 9th time, the attempt by radical activists to redefine the meaning of marriage in Australia has failed. In a 21-19 vote against the bill, NSW has joined Tasmania and the Commonwealth parliament in rejecting attempts to redefine marriage. Furthermore, the High Court decision , due early December, is likely to declare ACT’s attempt to redefine marriage as invalid. This would likely settle the matter for good, protecting marriage from any future attacks via state or territory legislatures. This would make the 10th such time activists have been defeated. Keep up the effort to defend children’s birth-right to their mother and father. However homosexual advocates don't obey nor support the rule of law. They care little about anything except themselves. They will continue to push their isolated immoral views, playing the victims, blame suicides,

English: Barry O'Farrell at the NSW Country Liberals Annual Conference in Wagga Wagga (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) The upper house of the NSW Parliament has voted down a bill to legalise immoral same-sex marriage. Despite the talk that the upper house would pass the legislation, MPs voted against it in strength in Legislative Council on Thursday afternoon. The point is this is the 11th attempt by various individuals and extreme parties to push through and legalize immoral homosexual marriage and each time common sense and morality has succeeded. Independent MP Alex Greenwich, who devised this immoral bill, should realize the civil unions and not marriage should be his goal instead of trying to force his immoral values upon the entire nation. Mr Greenwich, who is the member for Sydney in the lower house and therefore did not participate in the vote, said it was the first time Coalition MPs had voted in a same sex marriage bill in Australia. This is because Mr O'Farrel ha

English: Barry O'Farrell in 2010. Cropped picture. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) A NSW Liberal politician who supports gay marriage but out of sync with Federal Liberal policies, has said he is ''grateful'' to Premier Barry O'Farrell for setting up an inquiry that yesterday incorrectly cleared the way for NSW to introduce a bill to legalise immoral homosexual. Liberal member for Coogee, Bruce Notley-Smith  then tried to claim that this was democracy and not a minor group seeking to impose its immorality on the rest of the nation. NSW could become the first Australian state to legalise immorality and force homosexual marriage. A group of MPs from across the left and immoral Green spectrum have redrafted a Same Sex Marriage Bill that will be introduced in the upper house of the NSW parliament in the next session. Mr O'Farrell has promised a conscience vote on the issue, and is the first Liberal leader to do so and most likely will regret doing so. '

ACT electorates, as depicted at http://www.katygallagher.net/electorate.cfm Brindabella Molonglo Ginninderra (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) The ACT may become the first Australian jurisdiction to legalise same-sex marriage, or put another way promote grievous immorality as righteousness. To say to God your laws and moral do not apply to us. The ACT Government will introduce legislation during the spring sittings of the Legislative Assembly to establish the Territory Same-sex Marriage Act. Same-sex couples in the ACT have been able to register their civil partnership since 2008, and last year a bill was passed to reinstate legally binding ceremonies. But the ACT Government wants to go further and give full marriage equality to same-sex couples. The Federal Government argues it has the sole responsibility for marriage laws, but ACT Attorney-General Simon Corbell says he is confident the Territory has the authority to go further. Even though South Australia lost the vote last wee

Barry O'Farrell at Flag Day in Sydney (Photo credit: theducks ) To the great moral shame of Australia New South Wales Premier Barry O'Farrell has come out in support of same-sex marriage. Not to be left behind going down the moral sewer, Homosexual Mari Gras Sydney wants to follow  a vote to make gay marriage legal in New Zealand . Mr O'Farrell says same-sex marriage is "about family ". He also told the newspaper that if a parliamentary inquiry in New South Wales found the state could act alone, he would vote for legislation that might be introduced. Unfortunately, O'Farrell simplistic concept of marriage is lacking any moral or biological logic. The marriage Act governs Australia. Some politicans think they are bigger than the whole country and can dictate to everybody.  O'Farrell appears to be not telling the truth regarding healthy families? he also seems to be freely defining what constitutes a family. Who gave hiom this authority? 

English: IPSF HIV/AIDS Campaign Logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) A NSW government MP stunned colleagues at an inquiry into gay marriage when she accused the gay community of ''looking down'' on women and deliberately excluding them from efforts to combat AIDS . Catherine Cusack , a Liberal, asked the head of an AIDS-fighting agency whether gay men routinely referred to women as ''breeders'', ''beards'' and '' fag hags ''. Nicolas Parkhill, the chief executive of ACON, a community-based gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender health organisation, said he was ''taken aback'' at the line of questioning at a hearing of Parliament's standing committee on social issues on March 15. Ms Cusack went on to question whether ACON was delivering HIV/AIDS programs to the 20 per cent of people who contract the disease every year who are heterosexual. Advertisement Her first question to Mr Parkhill was: '&#