Does the Bible condemn gay homosexual people?

-
Portal of the Church of Pilgrims, in Washingto...
Portal of the Church of Pilgrims, in Washington, DC, with a LGBT banner. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
It is the sin for which Sodom gains its reputation as ungodly, wicked, and deserving of divine judgment (Genesis 18–19). Terms used in the Hebrew (yādaʿ) and the Greek (synginomai) meaning “to know” (Genesis 19:5) must have a sexual connotation and are among several euphemisms for sexual intercourse used in the Old Testament. Homosexuality is the sin or crime that the Benjaminites committed at Gibeah (Judges 19–20), which so enraged the rest of Israel that they almost eradicated the Benjaminites. None of the passages will sustain the view that the sin involved at Sodom or Gibeah was merely inhospitality or violence; none of the texts cites inhospitality. Revisionist attempts to use patristic interpretations fail. The church fathers simply do not support these arguments.

The references in Deuteronomy and Kings refer mainly to male prostitutes used in religious settings. This must include homosexual unions in light of the culture of the day. All the Greek terms the LXX uses in these passages have a sexual meaning or connotation, often with religious overtones. References to homosexuality in the Apocrypha and the Pseudepigrapha, discussed in detail in chapter 2, follow Old Testament usage.

In Ezekiel 16:50, the word abominations (toʿeba, Gk. anomos) refers to homosexuality as the sin of Sodom. Other references to Sodom in the Old Testament implicitly support the homosexual nature of the sin of Sodom.

Leviticus 18 and 20, the section that most clearly describes and condemns homosexuality for Israel, is universal rather than cultic in scope. There is evidence of universality within the larger context of the book. Specific to this section is its personal rather than cultic content, its covenantal literary form, its six uses of toʿeba (Gk. bdelygma), and its prescribed punishment of death for violators. Quotations of chapters 18–20 by Christ, Paul, James, and Peter in the New Testament, are meaningless outside of a strong assumption that the texts remain normative. That necessarily includes prohibitions of homosexual behavior. In addition, Jewish tradition (the Mishnah) basically repeats or affirms the Old Testament estimation of homosexuality. Finally, the biblical teaching is in sharp contrast to the looser morality of the surrounding pagan nations. None of them prohibited all expressions of homosexual activity, including pederasty.

When one considers all of the foregoing witnesses, the inescapable conclusion is that the Old Testament teaches that homosexuality is sin and brings God’s judgment. Equally important is the conclusion that the Old Testament view is universally normative and true. It is a valid standard for all societies for all time.

Related articles

Popular posts from this blog

Ontario Catholic school board to vote on flying gay ‘pride flag’ at all board-run schools

-
Image
A Catholic school board in Ontario will vote next week on a motion to fly the rainbow-colored homosexual pride flag at all board-run schools during the month of June. Halton Catholic District School Board (HCDSB) Trustee Brenda Agnew gave notice of her motion titled “supporting our diverse school community” during an April 6 board meeting. Quoting Pope Francis along with LGBT talking points about “equity and inclusion,” the motion calls for the Board’s Director of Education Pat Daly to “direct all HCDSB schools including the Catholic Education Centre to fly the Pride flag during the month of June starting with 2021.” The motion is expected to be voted on by the Board at their next meeting on April 20. With nine trustees, the motion requires five votes to pass. A tied vote results in a fail. The HCDSB states on its website that its mission is to provide “excellence in Catholic education by developing Christ-centred individuals enabled to transform society.” The Catholic Church, basing i
Read more

Christian baker must make ‘wedding’ bakes for gay couples, court rules

-
Image
DENVER, CO ,  – A Colorado board has ruled that a Christian business owner must make wedding cakes for homosexual "marriages" despite his religious objections. Business owner Jack Phillips came under legal fire in 2012, when he refused to bake a cake for Dave Mullins and Charlie Craig , who had traveled to Massachusetts for a marriage license, and wanted to celebrate in their home state. They sued on the basis of a state law that prevents the application of religious beliefs if one owns a business. The Commission's ruling, which was issued verbally on Friday, orders Phillips to report every three months for the next two years on anti-discrimination training for his staff, and any customers who are refused service at his establishment. "I can believe anything I want, but if I'm going to do business here, I'd ought to not discriminate against people," said one of the Civil Rights Commission 's seven members in a public statement. Phil
Read more

Australia: Gay Hate tribunals are coming

-
Image
Are Hate Tribunals Are Coming In Canada , it is considered discriminatory to say that marriage is between a man and a woman or that every child should know and be raised by his or her biological married parents.  It is not just politically incorrect in Canada to say so; you can be saddled with tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees, fined, and forced to take sensitivity training. Anyone who is offended by something you have said or written can make a complaint to the Human Rights Commissions and Tribunals. In Canada, these organizations police speech, penalizing citizens for any expression deemed in opposition to particular sexual behaviors or protected groups identified under “sexual orientation.” It takes only one complaint against a person to be brought before the tribunal, costing the defendant tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees. The commissions have the power to enter private residences and remove all items pertinent to their investigations, checking fo
Read more