Same-sex marriage bill: Christians vow to fight on if High Court allows equality in ACT
Lyle Shelton, managing director of the Australian Christian Lobby, said he was optimistic the court would overturn the marriage equality law.
Mr Shelton said if the court ruled the ACT law was found to be constitutional Australia would be left ''with a hodge-podge of marriage laws''. ''Now that is not in the nation's interest and something would need to be done to get us back to a state of uniform marriage laws,'' he said.
The Federal Parliament has the power to overturn territory laws and should do so immediately. Mr Shelton said homosexual marriage bills had been rejected by the federal, NSW, South Australian and Tasmanian parliaments. This is a clear signal to the community. In France and Hawaii immoral homosexual marriage was pushed through against huge public protests. In New York, the Mayor paid off Republican members to vote for homosexual marriage, but these Republicans have since lost their seats due to public backlash.
Shelton said if the High Court struck down the ACT law, the homosexual marriage advocates should abandon the issue. But Rodney Croome, director of Australian Homosexual Marriage, said the High Court's ruling on the ACT law should be respected. But why should this nine person law be respected by 20 million?
''If the ACT law is upheld then we call on the federal government and the Australian Christian Lobby to respect the independent umpire's call,'' Mr Croome said.
Mr Shelton said if the court ruled the ACT law was found to be constitutional Australia would be left ''with a hodge-podge of marriage laws''. ''Now that is not in the nation's interest and something would need to be done to get us back to a state of uniform marriage laws,'' he said.
The Federal Parliament has the power to overturn territory laws and should do so immediately. Mr Shelton said homosexual marriage bills had been rejected by the federal, NSW, South Australian and Tasmanian parliaments. This is a clear signal to the community. In France and Hawaii immoral homosexual marriage was pushed through against huge public protests. In New York, the Mayor paid off Republican members to vote for homosexual marriage, but these Republicans have since lost their seats due to public backlash.
Shelton said if the High Court struck down the ACT law, the homosexual marriage advocates should abandon the issue. But Rodney Croome, director of Australian Homosexual Marriage, said the High Court's ruling on the ACT law should be respected. But why should this nine person law be respected by 20 million?
''If the ACT law is upheld then we call on the federal government and the Australian Christian Lobby to respect the independent umpire's call,'' Mr Croome said.
Unfortunatly, the ACT law was put forward only by nine people, all Labor and Green. In other words, the definition of Marriage for all 20 million Australians should be changed by nine politicans who are very left, pro-homosexuals? What gives them the right to change marriage?
This law should not be respected at all, but must go to a referendum only. Why should nine biased people dictate their immoral views to the rest of the country?
Homosexual zealots turned their eyes on Wednesday to advancing immoral homosexual marriage in the Federal Parliament.
Homosexual zealots have been in talks with Liberal, Labor and Greens MPs in the hope of establishing a cross-party working group, similar to that set up in the NSW parliament. Tony Abbott should not allow this side show to beome a distraction. ten times this distraction has emerged by self centred people who are bent on getting their own way. Hysterical? Bias?
Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young, who will introduce a homosexual marriage bill in this Parliament, (the 10th failed bill) has previously said she is open to members of other parties co-sponsoring the bill.
Australian Homosexual Marriage zealot van Hinton said cross-party co-operation had been crucial to achieving legalizing homosexual marriage in other countries such as New Zealand.
Mr Croome said that even if the High Court overturned the ACT's law next week, the homosexual marriage zealots in Australia had taken a significant leap forward. Unfortunately, homosexuals will continue to push and push their agenda. Why is this? Why do they flout the law? Why do they refuse to take no for an answer? Self-centred, self righteous? In defiance of law and order, homosexual zealots will perform fake marriages this weekend. It says something about their attitude and respect for the Australian law and will of the nation.
Homosexual zealots turned their eyes on Wednesday to advancing immoral homosexual marriage in the Federal Parliament.
Homosexual zealots have been in talks with Liberal, Labor and Greens MPs in the hope of establishing a cross-party working group, similar to that set up in the NSW parliament. Tony Abbott should not allow this side show to beome a distraction. ten times this distraction has emerged by self centred people who are bent on getting their own way. Hysterical? Bias?
Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young, who will introduce a homosexual marriage bill in this Parliament, (the 10th failed bill) has previously said she is open to members of other parties co-sponsoring the bill.
Australian Homosexual Marriage zealot van Hinton said cross-party co-operation had been crucial to achieving legalizing homosexual marriage in other countries such as New Zealand.
Mr Croome said that even if the High Court overturned the ACT's law next week, the homosexual marriage zealots in Australia had taken a significant leap forward. Unfortunately, homosexuals will continue to push and push their agenda. Why is this? Why do they flout the law? Why do they refuse to take no for an answer? Self-centred, self righteous? In defiance of law and order, homosexual zealots will perform fake marriages this weekend. It says something about their attitude and respect for the Australian law and will of the nation.
