Posts

Christian college under pressure after seeking exemption from gay special protections

Image
Official photographic portrait of immoral US President Barack Obama (born 4 August 1961; assumed office 20 January 2009) (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Gordon College in Massachusetts has lost a municipal contract and faces a possible threat to its accreditation after its president signed a letter to President Obama requesting a religious exemption from an expected Executive Order   adding homosexuality and transgender status as protected class  for the employees of organizations holding federal contracts. On July 1, Gordon College President D. Michael Lindsay cosigned a letter with more than a dozen other faith leaders -- some of them public Obama supporters -- asking President Obama to provide a religious exemption in his upcoming Executive Order. In response to the letter, the mayor of Salem, Massachusetts , Kim Driscoll, terminated the city's contract  with Gordon. Driscoll wrote in a  letter  that Lindsay's signature brought to light "current policies at

Court backs Baptist college that expelled trans student for lying on application

Image
English: The 100,000 square-foot Yeager Center is the hub of the CBU campus and features classrooms, offices, stores, restaurants and key student service departments including admissions, financial aid and career services. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) A California court has  sided with  a Baptist college that was  sued for discrimination after expelling a cross-dressing male nursing student who lied on his application and said he was a female.   The school discovered Domaine Javier’s deception after he appeared on an episode of MTV ’s “ True Life ” reality show called “I’m Passing as Someone I’m Not,” in which he revealed that he was only pretending to be female. Javier sued California Baptist University for $500,000 in damages after the school expelled him for fraud, arguing that his expulsion was a violation of California’s civil rights act, which explicitly forbids discrimination based on “gender, gender identity and gender expression.” On Friday, Superior Court

Lesbian expelled from Christian university after ‘marrying’ her same-sex partner

Image
English: Oklahoma State Capitol in Oklahoma City. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) A senior at Oklahoma’s Southwestern Christian University has been expelled after publicizing her same-sex “marriage” on social media, in violation of the university’s “lifestyle covenant.” The covenant, which all students sign upon enrollment, forbids homosexual relationships , sex outside of marriage, and other behaviors the university’s International Pentecostal Holiness denomination considers immoral. Christian Minard, 22, and her girlfriend, Kadyn Park, traveled from their home state of Oklahoma to New Mexico in order to get “married” in March. Same-sex “marriage” is illegal in Oklahoma, so their marriage is not considered valid in their own state. The pair had been dating for more than three years, but university officials were unaware of the relationship until the couple posted photos of their “wedding” – in which Minard played the role of the “groom,” sporting men’s attire and a close-cr

Gay Gestapo intimidate Bank employees

Image
This is the smoking gun.  NOM has obtained new evidence that shows Chase bank not only violated its employees' privacy with invasive and inappropriate questions on an employee survey aimed at pushing an LGBT agenda, but that the company has lied to consumers and its own employees about the now infamous questions. The news about this survey has already been reported far and wide. But after NOM called on our members to contact Chase and demand answers about the invasive question to employees about whether they were "allies of the LGBT community "—and answers about how this information was to be used—the bank's leadership went on defense. Several of you forwarded me responses received from Patricia A. Wexler, a Chase spokesperson, who said that,  "The news report is not correct. These surveys are anonymous and voluntary."  Another Chase spokesperson, Jaclyn D' Aversa , reiterated to the Heritage Foundation 's  Daily Signal  that the survey was

Chase Bank intimates staff to support immoral homosexual agenda

Image
This is the smoking gun.  NOM has obtained new evidence that shows Chase bank not only violated its employees' privacy with invasive and inappropriate questions on an employee survey aimed at pushing an LGBT agenda, but that the company has lied to consumers and its own employees about the now infamous questions. Today, NOM is launching an international petition and boycott at www.VoidChase.com to send the message that this kind of invasiveness and dishonesty is unacceptable and will not go unchallenged. I urge you to read on to get the facts for yourself, and then head over to www.VoidChase.com to join this important effort. The news about this survey has already been reported far and wide. But after NOM called on our members to contact Chase and demand answers about the invasive question to employees about whether they were "allies of the LGBT community "—and answers about how this information was to be used—the bank's leadership went on defense. Several

US judges have no business setting marriage policy

Today the  10th Circuit Court of Appeals issued an important ruling  on Utah ’s marriage amendment. This is the first time a circuit court has ruled on marriage since the  U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)  this time last year. In a 2-1 split decision, the 10th circuit ruled that Utah’s marriage amendment defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman violates the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution . The majority held that “the Fourteenth Amendment protects the fundamental right to marry” and that “a state may not deny the issuance of a marriage license to two persons, or refuse to recognize their marriage, based solely upon the sex of the persons in the marriage union.” The decision will almost certainly be appealed. Of course the Fourteenth Amendment protects the fundamental right to marry—but the  Supreme Court decisions that established a fundamental right to marry  understood  marriage as the union of a man and a woman . In