GAY TRUTH

Canada ’s Senate passed the Justin Trudeau Liberals’ transgender rights bill unamended this afternoon by a vote of 67 to 11, with three abstentions. The bill adds “gender expression” and “gender identity” to Canada’s Human Rights Code and to the Criminal Code’s hate crime section. With the Senate clearing the bill with no amendments, it requires only royal assent in the House of Commons to become law. Critics warn that under Bill C-16, Canadians who deny gender theory could be charged with hate crimes, fined, jailed, and compelled to undergo anti-bias training. Foremost among these critics is University of Toronto psychology professor Dr. Jordan Peterson , who along with lawyer D. Jared Brown, told the Senate committee that Bill C-16 is an unprecedented threat to freedom of expression and codifies a spurious ideology of gender identity in law. Peterson was invited to the committee by Manitoba Senator Don Plett, who voted against the bill. Plett unsuccessfully proposed a

An Ontario Liberal bill that legal experts warn gives the state greater power to seize children and can be used to enforce gender ideology in the home sailed unopposed through second reading last week. Eighty-three of Ontario ’s 107 MPPs voted unanimously March 9 to send Bill 89 to the  Liberal-dominated   Standing Committee on Justice Policy. Parents As First Educators (PAFE) president Tanya Granic Allen says it’s a “shame that not one MPP voted against” the  “Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act” at second reading. “I expect MPPs to stand up to political pressure and to do their job of representing parents who are worried about the government's infringement in their family life,”she told LifeSiteNews. Bill 89 repeals and replaces the existing Child and Family Services Act, which governs child protection services , and adoption and foster care services. It adds “ gender identity ” and “gender expression” as factors to be considered “in the best interests

Those who are setting our so-called “values”, such as the small but powerful group of academics, mainstream media, and homosexual activists, do so by attempting to impose strange myths and ideas that have no scientific basis. These myths include the one that homosexuals are “born that way”, can’t change, and must be accepted for “who they are”. Further, those claiming they are a different gender than that with which they were born, i.e. the transgendered, who “feel” they belong to other than their gender at birth, must be accepted as such. The public is supposed to put aside its intelligence and common sense, and respectfully bow collectively in obeisance to these “expert” opinions. These opinions, however, are complete and utter hogwash. We know instinctively that they are not authentic, or worthy of our belief. However, the myth-makers attempt to force their nonsense on us by the heavy hand of the law, claiming that it’s “discrimination” to refuse to accept the myths as t

Australia has spoken, time and time again — Safe Schools needs to change, or go. It cannot continue to be implemented in its current form. Many critics of the program fully support the notion of anti-bullying for vulnerable students. But in its current version, the program has proven itself incapable of meeting the expectations of too many parents and health professionals alike. These concerns can no longer be written off as old-fashioned, daft or simply bigoted. The initial concerns over the Safe Schools program made reference to the sexualised and potentially age-inappropriate content. But the debate has snowballed much further. Today, there are endless petitions on both sides, street protests, MP’s offices have been vandalised for their criticisms and abuse is shared. Anti-bullying to boot. Supporters of Safe Schools claim to be most concerned for vulnerable students. Presumably then, these supporters would have the strongest interest in evaluating the evidence-base of such con